Damage Mechanism on Aircraft Coatings of Different Thicknesses under High-speed Water Jet Impact

SHA Minggong, HUI Zhiqiang, SUN Ying, WU Minjun, LI Ming, BABAYTSEV Arseny, DAI Xiaoyan, SHEN Jianguang, LI Yulong

Surface Technology ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (14) : 17-32.

PDF(21280 KB)
PDF(21280 KB)
Surface Technology ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (14) : 17-32. DOI: 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2026.14.002
Corrosion and Protection

Damage Mechanism on Aircraft Coatings of Different Thicknesses under High-speed Water Jet Impact

  • SHA Minggong1,2, HUI Zhiqiang1, SUN Ying3, WU Minjun4, LI Ming5,6, BABAYTSEV Arseny3, DAI Xiaoyan4,*, SHEN Jianguang4,*, LI Yulong1,2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

As a critical component on the leading edge of an aircraft's airframe, the composite radar dome is susceptible to multiple types of damage to its skin when the aircraft passes through rain showers at high speed, resulting in a significant decline in the dome's performance and posing a threat to flight safety. Therefore, a rain-erosion-resistant coating is typically applied to its surface to ensure that the dome meets performance protection requirements. To elucidate the mechanism of rain erosion damage to the radar dome skin coating and to investigate the factors affecting coating damage and their mechanisms of action under different conditions, this work used T300 carbon fiber as the substrate and applied a coating consisting of an epoxy primer and a polyurethane topcoat as test specimens. The rain erosion damage behavior of specimens coated with different types and thicknesses of aerospace polyurethane coatings was evaluated at various impact velocities. Three thickness configurations were established: with a uniform primer thickness of 200 μm and topcoat thicknesses of 200, 250, and 350 μm, with a uniform topcoat thickness of 300 μm and primer thicknesses of 100, 150, and 250 μm and with a total coating thickness of 500 μm and primer-to-topcoat ratios of 1∶4, 3∶7, 1∶1, and 3∶2. The test setup consisted of a single-jet test platform based on a 10-mm light gas gun, providing jet velocities ranging from 360 to 617 m/s for this experiment. The results indicated that the typical morphology of rain erosion damage was annular, consisting of a damaged region surrounding a central undamaged area. As the damage severity increased, it gradually evolved into circular delamination damage. The severity of damage to the three coating specimens was quantitatively characterized. Data fitting revealed that both the damaged area and volume increased as the jet impact velocity rose. At a 15° impact angle, the velocity threshold at which visible damage began to appear on the coating surface was approximately 360 m/s. Among the factors affecting rain erosion damage to the coating, surface roughness played a more significant role than mechanical parameters such as hardness and modulus of elasticity. When the primer thickness is constant, the area of rain erosion damage gradually decreases as the topcoat thickness increases. A thicker topcoat can mitigate the effects of stress waves and water hammer pressure at the topcoat-primer interface, thereby reducing damage. When the topcoat thickness remains constant, the area of rain-erosion damage gradually increases as the primer thickness increases from 100 μm to 150 μm. However, when the primer thickness reaches 250 μm, the area of rain-erosion damage actually decreases. This phenomenon is attributed to reduced reflection and transmission of stress waves once the primer thickness exceeds the critical protective thickness. When the total coating thickness remains constant, the extent of damage initially increases and then decreases as the ratio of primer to topcoat increases. This indicates that, within the specified thickness range, rain erosion damage to radar dome skin coatings can be reduced by increasing the proportion of topcoat.

Key words

high-speed aircraft / rain-erosion damage / skin coating / jet impact / damage assessment

Cite this article

Download Citations
SHA Minggong, HUI Zhiqiang, SUN Ying, WU Minjun, LI Ming, BABAYTSEV Arseny, DAI Xiaoyan, SHEN Jianguang, LI Yulong. Damage Mechanism on Aircraft Coatings of Different Thicknesses under High-speed Water Jet Impact[J]. Surface Technology. 2026, 55(14): 17-32

References

[1] DÉOM A, GOUYON R, BERNE C. Rain Erosion Resistance Characterizations Link between On-Ground Experiments and In-Flight Specifications[J]. Wear, 2005, 258(1/2/3/4): 545-551.
[2] FYALL A A, KING R B, STRAIN R N C. Rain Erosion Aspects of Aircraft and Guided Missiles[J]. The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 1962, 66(619): 447-453.
[3] TEMPELIS A, JESPERSEN K M, DYER K, et al. How Leading Edge Roughness Influences Rain Erosion of Wind Turbine Blades?[J]. Wear, 2024, 552/553: 205446.
[4] GOHARDANI O.Impact of Erosion Testing Aspects on Current and Future Flight Conditions[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011, 47(4): 280-303.
[5] JENKINS D C.Erosion of Surfaces by Liquid Drops[J]. Nature, 1955, 176(4476): 303-304.
[6] KENNEDY C F, FIELD J E.Damage Threshold Velocities for Liquid Impact[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2000, 35(21): 5331-5339.
[7] FYALL A A, KING R B.The Rain Erosion Characteristics of Concorde: Part 1—Summary Report: RAE/TR-75078 [R]. Royal Aircraft Establishment, 1975
[8] WADDELL E M, GIBSON D R, WILSON M.Broadband IR Transparent Rain and Sand Erosion Protective Coating for the F-14 Aircraft Infrared Search and Track Germanium Dome[C]//Window and Dome Technologies and Materials IV. 1994, 2286: 376-385.
[9] LI X M, LIU P, CHENG H, et al.Impact Damage Prediction of CFRP Laminates with Rubber Protective Layer Using Back-Propagation Neural Networks[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2023, 127(7): 3281-3296.
[10] PATEL M, PATEL S, AHMAD S.Blast Analysis of Efficient Honeycomb Sandwich Structures with CFRP/Steel FML Skins[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2023, 178: 104609.
[11] DONG F, MA Q H, QIN X Y, et al.Failure Analysis of Al/CFRP Hybrid Tube with Initial Damage during Axial Compression[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2022, 181: 110108.
[12] 高坤, 孙宝岗, 杨智勇, 等. 透波复合材料用树脂基体介电性能的改善研究进展[J]. 功能材料, 2015, 46(S2): 44-48.
GAO K, SUN B G, YANG Z Y, et al.Improvement Research Progress in the Dielectric Properties of Resin Matrix for Wave-Transparent Composites[J]. Journal of Functional Materials, 2015, 46(S2): 44-48.
[13] 王飞, 石佩洛. 树脂基复合材料在雷达天线罩领域的应用及发展[J]. 宇航材料工艺, 2017, 47(2): 10-13.
WANG F, SHI P L.Application and Development of Resin Matrix Composites for Radomes[J]. Aerospace Materials & Technology, 2017, 47(2): 10-13.
[14] 刘志强, 王祯鑫, 宣海军, 等. 三维机织复合材料弹道冲击试验研究[J]. 航空科学技术, 2023, 34(2): 49-55.
LIU Z Q, WANG Z X, XUAN H J, et al.Research on 3D Woven Composites Ballistic Impact Test[J]. Aeronautical Science and Technology, 2023, 34(2): 49-55.
[15] COTO B, HALLANDER P, MENDIZABAL L, et al. Particle and Rain Erosion Mechanisms on Ti/TiN Multilayer PVD Coatings for Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer Substrates Protection[J]. Wear, 2021, 466/467: 203575.
[16] HOKSBERGEN T H, AKKERMAN R, BARAN I.Rain Droplet Impact Stress Analysis for Leading Edge Protection Coating Systems for Wind Turbine Blades[J]. Renewable Energy, 2023, 218: 119328.
[17] SLOT H M, GELINCK E R M, RENTROP C, et al. Leading Edge Erosion of Coated Wind Turbine Blades: Review of Coating Life Models[J]. Renewable Energy, 2015, 80: 837-848.
[18] MISHNAEVSKY L Jr, FÆSTER S, MIKKELSEN L P, et al. Micromechanisms of Leading Edge Erosion of Wind Turbine Blades: X-Ray Tomography Analysis and Computational Studies[J]. Wind Energy, 2020, 23(3): 547-562.
[19] KIROLS H S, KEVORKOV D, UIHLEIN A, et al. The Effect of Initial Surface Roughness on Water Droplet Erosion Behaviour[J]. Wear, 2015, 342/343: 198-209.
[20] ADLER W F.Rain Impact Retrospective and Vision for the Future[J]. Wear, 1999, 233: 25-38.
[21] FIELD J E. ELSI Conference: Invited Lecture[J]. Wear, 1999, 233/234/235: 1-12.
[22] TOBIN E F, YOUNG T M, RAPS D, et al.Comparison of Liquid Impingement Results from Whirling Arm and Water-Jet Rain Erosion Test Facilities[J]. Wear, 2011, 271(9/10): 2625-2631.
[23] OBARA T, BOURNE N K, FIELD J E. Liquid-Jet Impact on Liquid and Solid Surfaces[J]. Wear, 1995, 186/187: 388-394.
[24] HAND R J, FIELD J E, TOWNSEND D.The Use of Liquid Jets to Simulate Angled Drop Impact[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1991, 70(11): 7111-7118.
[25] FIELD J E, GORHAM D A, RICKERBY D G.High- speed Liquid Jet and Drop Impact on Brittle Targets[M]. West Conshohocken, Pa.: ASTM International, 1979.
[26] 沙明工, 孙莹, 李雨桐, 等. 高速雨滴冲击下飞行器蒙皮涂层损伤行为动态实验研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(8): 92-105.
SHA M G, SUN Y, LI Y T, et al.Dynamic Experimental Study on Damage Behaviors of Aircraft Envelope Coating under the Impact of High-Speed Raindrops[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2023, 43(8): 92-105.
[27] WANG X, XU J J, CUI H, et al.On the Damage Behavior of Poly (methyl methacrylate) Impacted by High-Velocity Water Jet[J]. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 2022, 595: 121838.
[28] 侯乃丹, 王旋, 李玉龙. 基于单射流冲击试验的复合材料高速雨滴撞击损伤研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(4): 66-78.
HOU N D, WANG X, LI Y L.High-speed Raindrop Impingement Damage of Composites Based on Single Waterjet Impact Tests[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2021, 41(4): 66-78.
[29] ELHADI IBRAHIM M, MEDRAJ M.Water Droplet Erosion of Wind Turbine Blades: Mechanics, Testing, Modeling and Future Perspectives[J]. Materials, 2020, 13(1): 157.
[30] SHA M G, SUN Y, LI Y T, et al.Impact Damage Testing Based on High-Speed Continuous Water Jet Aircraft Coatings[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(10): 249-264.
[31] ZHAO R X, HOU N D, WANG X, et al.Mechanical Response and Damage Mechanism of C/SiC Composites Impacted by High-Velocity Water Jet[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2023, 43(8): 3158-3171.
[32] HOU N D, ZHAO R X, WANG X, et al.Effects of Surface Topography and Specimen Thickness on High- Speed Raindrop Impact Damage of CFRP Laminates[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(6): 186-200.
[33] IMESON A C, VIS R, DE WATER E.The Measurement of Water-Drop Impact Forces with a Piezo-Electric Transducer[J]. Catena, 1981, 8(1): 83-96.
[34] NEARING M A, BRADFORD J M, HOLTZ R D.Measurement of Force Vs. Time Relations for Waterdrop Impact[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1986, 50(6): 1532-1536.
[35] HEYMANN F J.On the Shock Wave Velocity and Impact Pressure in High-Speed Liquid-Solid Impact[J]. Journal of Basic Engineering, 1968, 90(3): 400-402.
[36] LU Y Y, HUANG F, LIU X C, et al.On the Failure Pattern of Sandstone Impacted by High-Velocity Water Jet[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 76: 67-74.
[37] ZHANG Z Y, ZHANG D, XIE Y H. Experimental Study on Water Droplet Erosion Resistance of Coatings (Ni60 and WC-17Co) Sprayed by APS and HVOF[J]. Wear, 2019, 432/433: 202950.
[38] 杨昭君, 李雨桐, 李明, 等. 高动态雨滴冲击飞机蒙皮涂层的抗雨蚀影响因素与损伤机理[J]. 表面技术, 2025, 54(10): 82-95.
YANG Z J, LI Y T, LI M, et al.Affecting Factors of Rain Erosion Resistance and Damage Mechanisms of the Aircraft Skin Coating Impacted by High Dynamic Raindrops[J]. Surface Technology, 2025, 54(10): 82-95.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (12261131505, U2241274); Aviation Science Foundation of China (20240002053002); Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (2025JC-YBMS-005); Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi (2024GX- YBXM-037); Basic Research Programs of Taicang (TC2024JC10)
PDF(21280 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/