Erosion Analysis of Combined V-ball Valve and Bend Section in Pneumatic Conveying

ZHANG Jianwen, CAO Jincheng, CHEN Fengtian, SU Guoqing, HONG Xiaoqing

Surface Technology ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (13) : 196-211.

PDF(14909 KB)
PDF(14909 KB)
Surface Technology ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (13) : 196-211. DOI: 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2026.13.017
Friction, Wear and Lubrication

Erosion Analysis of Combined V-ball Valve and Bend Section in Pneumatic Conveying

  • ZHANG Jianwen1a*, CAO Jincheng1b, CHEN Fengtian2,*, SU Guoqing1a, HONG Xiaoqing1b
Author information +
History +

Abstract

This study presents a systematic investigation into the gas-solid two-phase flow and wall erosion characteristics within a valve-bend assembly of a pneumatic conveying system, aiming to elucidate the erosion patterns and underlying mechanisms induced by nitrogen-transported adsorbent particles during the gasoline desulfurization process. The study focuses on a V-ball valve connected to bends assembly, representing a typical configuration in industrial pneumatic conveying systems. A three-dimensional numerical model is developed based on the computational fluid dynamics-discrete phase model (CFD- DPM), incorporating detailed geometric modeling, structured mesh generation, and rigorous boundary condition specification to resolve the turbulent gas flow, particle transport, and wall impingement characteristics under various operating conditions. Both fully opened and partially opened valve positions, including 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% openings, are simulated to investigate the effect of valve opening on flow structures, particle trajectories, and wall erosion distribution. The numerical results reveal that under fully open conditions, the primary erosion occurs in the second bend and the downstream straight pipe segment, with a maximum erosion rate reaching 4.48×10-7 kg/(m2·s). This behavior is primarily caused by the combined effects of the V-shaped valve geometry and an upstream protrusion located immediately before the first bend. The protrusion disrupts the approaching flow, causing the particles to impact the wall of the first bend at relatively shallow angles, resulting in comparatively low local erosion rates. After traversing the intermediate straight section, the particles enter the second bend and the downstream straight segment at larger impact angles, increasing the material removal rate at these locations. Consequently, the second bend and the downstream straight section exhibit the maximum erosion intensity under fully open conditions. When the valve is partially opened, the erosion pattern shifts toward the upstream and downstream faces of the valve core. Among the different throttling scenarios considered, the 60% valve opening exhibits the most severe erosion, with a peak erosion rate of 1.10×10-8 kg/(m2·s). This enhanced erosion results from the combined effects of three factors: the accelerated flow through the throttled valve port, which increases local gas velocity and enhances particle transport; the elevated fluid drag force acting on particles, which raises particle impact velocity; and variations in particle impact angles that optimize the erosion efficiency. Secondary vortices downstream of the valve further promote repeated wall collisions, contributing to intensified local erosion. Detailed analysis of the Eulerian-Lagrangian coupling indicates that both particle velocity and instantaneous drag forces exhibit significant spatial non-uniformity within the valve cavity and the bend assembly. This non-uniformity leads to a highly heterogeneous distribution of erosion intensity along the pipe walls, varying with valve opening, axial position, and circumferential location. The study highlights the critical influence of flow-field non-uniformity, particle inertia, and secondary flow structures on the development and evolution of wall erosion. By systematically characterizing the multiphase flow behavior, particle-wall interactions, and erosion distribution within a representative valve-bend assembly, this research provides essential theoretical guidance for improving the reliability and service life of adsorbent pneumatic conveying systems.

Key words

pneumatic conveying / V-ball valve and bend / gas-solid two-phase flow / erosion / fluid drag force / numerical simulation

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Jianwen, CAO Jincheng, CHEN Fengtian, SU Guoqing, HONG Xiaoqing. Erosion Analysis of Combined V-ball Valve and Bend Section in Pneumatic Conveying[J]. Surface Technology. 2026, 55(13): 196-211

References

[1] 苏国庆, 田学梅, 李彦, 等. 气力输送系统弯管三通的冲蚀分析及改进[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(8): 3894-3904.
SU G Q, TIAN X M, LI Y, et al.Erosion Analysis and Improvement of Curved-Tee in Pneumatic Conveying System[J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(8): 3894-3904.
[2] ZHENG K X, HU H X, CHEN F G, et al.Failure Analysis of the Blackwater Regulating Valve in the Coal Chemical Industry[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2021, 125: 105442.
[3] HAIDER G, OTHAYQ M, ZHANG J, et al.Effect of Particle Size on Erosion Measurements and Predictions in Annular Flow for an Elbow[J]. Wear, 2021, 476: 203579.
[4] 邱福寿, 王国涛, 彭辉, 等. 含凹坑缺陷稠油热采井口用四通管的冲蚀数值模拟研究[J]. 压力容器, 2021, 38(2): 28-36.
QIU F S, WANG G T, PENG H, et al.The Erosion Numerical Simulation Analysis of the Four-Way Pipe with Pit Defect Used in the Heavy Oil Thermal Production Wellhead[J]. Pressure Vessel Technology, 2021, 38(2): 28-36.
[5] CUI B C, ZHAO L, JIN C, et al.Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Particle Erosion and Structural Optimization of Two Elbows in Series under Solid- Liquid Flow[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2025, 213: 137-145.
[6] ELEMUREN R, TAMSAKI A, EVITTS R, et al.Erosion- Corrosion of 90° AISI 1018 Steel Elbows in Potash Slurry: Effect of Particle Concentration on Surface Roughness[J]. Wear, 2019, 430: 37-49.
[7] FINNIE I, STEVICK G R, RIDGELY J R.The Influence of Impingement Angle on the Erosion of Ductile Metals by Angular Abrasive Particles[J]. Wear, 1992, 152(1): 91-98.
[8] OKA Y I, OKAMURA K, YOSHIDA T.Practical Estimation of Erosion Damage Caused by Solid Particle Impact Part 1: Effects of Impact Parameters on a Predictive Equation[J]. Wear, 2005, 259(1): 95-101.
[9] AHMAD H M, ZHANG J, SHIRAZI S, et al.Experimental and CFD Analysis of Erosion in Plugged Tees in Series[J]. Wear, 2025, 570: 205956.
[10] VEISKARAMI A, SAIDI M.Numerical Analysis of Gas- Solid Flow Erosion in Different Geometries as Alternatives to a Standard Pipe Elbow[J]. Powder Technology, 2024, 448: 120334.
[11] CUI B C, CHEN P, ZHAO Y Q.Numerical Simulation of Particle Erosion in the Vertical-Upward-Horizontal Elbow under Multiphase Bubble Flow[J]. Powder Technology, 2022, 404: 117437.
[12] MOHEBI A R, NAJAFI F, MOZAFFARIAN M, et al.Fluid Dynamics and Erosion Analysis in Industrial Naphtha Reforming: A CFD-DPM Simulation Approach[J]. Powder Technology, 2024, 436: 119417.
[13] XU B L, LIN Z, ZHU Z C, et al.Experimental and Simulation Study of the Effect of Gravity on the Solid-Liquid Two-Phase Flow and Erosion of Ball Valve[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2022, 33(2): 103416.
[14] 谢晓刚, 石喜, 谭春彬, 等. 颗粒参数对倾斜串联弯管冲蚀磨损的影响[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(19): 8259-8268.
XIE X G, SHI X, TAN C B, et al.Influence of Particle Parameters on Erosion Wear of Inclined Tandem Bend[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2024, 24(19): 8259-8268.
[15] 刘恩斌, 李茜, 寇博, 等. 页岩气分离器阀套式排污阀冲蚀特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 52-60.
LIU E B, LI X, KOU B, et al.Study on Erosion Characteristics of Valve Sleeve Blowdown Valve of Shale Gas Separator[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(5): 52-60.
[16] 易先中, 彭灼, 周元华, 等. 高压压裂液对JY-50压裂弯管冲蚀行为影响的数值模拟[J]. 表面技术, 2019, 48(2): 144-151.
YI X Z, PENG Z, ZHOU Y H, et al.Numerical Simulation for Erosion Behavior of High-Pressure Fracturing Fluids on JY-50 Fracturing Bend Pipe[J]. Surface Technology, 2019, 48(2): 144-151.
[17] CAO X W, ZHANG J N, ZHAO X Y, et al. Investigation of Solid Particle Erosion Damage at Elbow Considering Particle Interaction[J]. Wear, 2025, 580/581: 206241.
[18] GAO C, XU G L, SHEN F H, et al.Numerical Simulation on Liquid-Solid Two-Phase Erosion Characteristics of Pipe Bends with Different Bend Angles[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2025, 216: 390-413.
[19] ZHAO X Y, CAO X W, ZHANG J N, et al.Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Erosion in Plugged Tees for Liquid-Solid Flow[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2023, 160: 104348.
[20] CHI M H, ZENG X G, GAO Y P, et al.The Erosion Rate Prediction for the Elbow in Shale Gas Gathering and Transportation System: RSM and GA-BP-ANN Modeling[J]. Powder Technology, 2024, 435: 119429.
[21] NEMATI B, VAGHEFI M, BEHROOZI A M.Numerical Investigation of the Erosion Reduction in Elbows Using Separate and Helical Inner Ring[J]. Results in Engineering, 2024, 23: 102499.
[22] XU L, CHEN X C, WU X K, et al.Coarse-Grained CFD- DEM Simulation of Elbow Erosion Induced by Dilute Gas-Solid Flow: A Multi-Level Study[J]. Powder Technology, 2024, 443: 119916.
[23] FORDER A, THEW M, HARRISON D.A Numerical Investigation of Solid Particle Erosion Experienced within Oilfield Control Valves[J]. Wear, 1998, 216(2): 184-193.
[1] 刘志桐, 董亮亮, 赵鹏, 等. 鹅颈管的冲蚀行为和内腔表面强化[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2025, 25(6): 2349-2355.
LIU Z T, DONG L L, ZHAO P, et al.Erosion Behavior and Inner Surface Strengthening of Gooseneck Tube[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2025, 25(6): 2349-2355.
[24] TAN D M, GAN Q L, TAO Y, et al.Effects of Axial Misalignment Welding Defects on the Erosive Wear of Natural Gas Piping[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2024, 158: 107972.
[25] SOLNORDAL C B, WONG C Y, BOULANGER J.An Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Erosion Caused by Sand Pneumatically Conveyed through a Standard Pipe Elbow[J]. Wear, 2015, 336: 43-57.
[26] ZHANG J X, KANG J, FAN J C, et al.Study on Erosion Wear of Fracturing Pipeline under the Action of Multiphase Flow in Oil & Gas Industry[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 32: 334-346.
[27] XIE L, TANG Y, WANG J Z, et al.Experimental Study on the L80 Steel Column Sample of Gas Storage Reservoir Tubing in High-Pressure Three-Phase Flow: Erosion Mechanism and Impact Angle Effect[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2025, 310: 121490.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFB3301100); Interdisciplinary Research Project of Beijing University of Chemical Technology (XK2023-07)
PDF(14909 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/