Effects of SO2 on Corrosion Products and Corrosion Mechanism of P110 Tubing Material Used for CO2 Storage

YANG Zhen, ZHAO Guoxian, LIU Ranran

Surface Technology ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2) : 50-60.

PDF(7980 KB)
PDF(7980 KB)
Surface Technology ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2) : 50-60. DOI: 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2026.02.005
Corrosion and Protection

Effects of SO2 on Corrosion Products and Corrosion Mechanism of P110 Tubing Material Used for CO2 Storage

  • YANG Zhen1, ZHAO Guoxian1,*, LIU Ranran2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

It is well known that the emission of greenhouse gases has become the main cause of climate change. These greenhouse gases include CO2, CH4, N2O, etc. Among them, the large amount of CO2 emissions caused by the combustion of fossil fuels has attracted much attention. Carbon capture and storage (CCS), as a cutting-edge technology for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, has drawn close attention from the international scientific and technological as well as industrial communities. During the storage of CO2, carbon source impurities such as SOx, O2, NOx, and H2S are inevitably present. Once water phase precipitates, carbon steel pipelines will face severe corrosion, leading to safety accidents such as high-pressure CO2 leakage.
The effects of various carbon source impurities on the metal materials corrosion behavior cannot be overlooked during the process of CO2 storage. In this work, high-temperature and high-pressure simulation tests are conducted on P110 tubing steel at 90 ℃ with the content of carbon source impurity SO2 being 0%, 2.5% and 5% respectively. Techniques such as laser confocal microscopy, SEM, EDS, EPMA, HRTEM, Raman spectrum and XPS are employed to analyze the film formation mechanisms of corrosion product layer and corrosion characteristics of P110 tubing steel. In aqueous solutions, SO2 dissolves to form H2SO3, which dissociates into HSO3- and SO32-. Under anaerobic conditions, SO32- can be reduced to S2-, reacting with Fe2+ to form FeS. In highly acidic or high-SO2 environments, S2- further combines to form S22-, leading to FeS2 formation. XPS analysis reveals that the sulfur species in the corrosion product film include FeS, FeS2, FeSO3, and FeSO4. Raman spectroscopy and XRD confirm the presence of these compounds, with FeS and FeSO3 dominating at higher SO2 levels. The formation of non-protective FeSO3 and the porous nature of the film significantly reduce its protective capability, accelerating corrosion rates. The results show that when there is no SO2, the corrosion product film is mainly composed of dense FeCO3 and a small amount of CaCO3, which has certain protective properties, but the uniform corrosion rate of the matrix material is still relatively high. With the increase of the SO2 content, the delamination phenomenon of the corrosion product film gets more obvious. The corrosion products present an irregular microscopic morphology, and the lattice fringes in the flower bracket-like regions are not distinct. The outer layer shows amorphous FeS, needle-like FeS2 and plate-like FeSO3, while the inner layer consists of FeCO3 and Fe3O4. The introduction of SO2 significantly increases the penetration depth of S element in the membrane (from 120 μm to 175 μm), and leads to the corrosion product membrane becoming loose and porous, with a decline in protection. When the SO2 content is 5%, Penetrating cracks appear in the corrosion product film, and the contents of FeS and FeSO3 significantly increase. At the same time, the cooperative effect of high temperature, high pressure and the acidic environment enhances the oxidizability of SO32-. Meanwhile, the structural defects of the corrosion product film provide channels for the continuous oxidation of S elements, leading to an increase in the proportion of high-valent S elements (S4+), which further exacerbates local corrosion and pitting corrosion.

Key words

P110 tubing steel / carbon source impurity SO2 / CO2 storage / corrosion product film / S elements oxidation

Cite this article

Download Citations
YANG Zhen, ZHAO Guoxian, LIU Ranran. Effects of SO2 on Corrosion Products and Corrosion Mechanism of P110 Tubing Material Used for CO2 Storage[J]. Surface Technology. 2026, 55(2): 50-60

References

[1] 侯保荣. 腐蚀成本与经济发展[J]. 中国科技产业, 2020(2): 21-22.
HOU B R.Corrosion Cost and Economic Development[J]. Science & Technology Industry of China, 2020(2): 21-22.
[2] SUN C, YAN X L, SUN J B, et al.Unraveling the Effect of O2, NO2 and SO2 Impurities on the Stress Corrosion Behavior of X65 Steel in Water-Saturated Supercritical CO2 Streams[J]. Corrosion Science, 2022, 209: 110729.
[3] KAIRY S K, ZHOU S, TURNBULL A, et al.Corrosion of Pipeline Steel in Dense Phase CO2 Containing Impurities: A Critical Review of Test Methodologies[J]. Corrosion Science, 2023, 214: 110986.
[4] SUN C, YANG W J, SUN J B, et al.Hydrogen Permeation and SCC Susceptibility of X70 Pipeline Steel in CO2-Saturated Water Environment Containing Acidic Impurity[J]. Corrosion Science, 2024, 236: 112259.
[5] ZHU R D, ZHU J Y, ZHANG Y N, et al.Effects of SO2 Impurity on Corrosion Behaviors of Novel 3Cr2Al Alloy Steel in Supercritical CO2 Brine Environment[J]. Corrosion Science, 2025, 255: 113109.
[6] XIANG Y, WANG Z, LI Z, et al.Effect of Temperature on Corrosion Behaviour of X70 Steel in High Pressure CO2/SO2/O2/H2O Environments[J]. Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology, 2013, 48(2): 121-129.
[7] WEI L, PANG X L, GAO K W.Effect of Small Amount of H2S on the Corrosion Behavior of Carbon Steel in the Dynamic Supercritical CO2 Environments[J]. Corrosion Science, 2016, 103: 132-144.
[8] LIU J, YAO D Z, CHEN K, et al.Effect of H2O Content on the Corrosion Behavior of X52 Steel in Supercritical CO2 Streams Containing O2, H2S, SO2 and NO2 Impurities[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(17): 6119.
[9] 龙郑伟. EOR-CCUS系统油套管腐蚀规律研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2019.
LONG Z W.Study on Corrosion Law of Tubing and Casing in EOR-CCUS System[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2019.
[10] FARELAS F, CHOI Y S, NESIC S.Effects of CO2 Phase Change, SO2 Content and Flow on the Corrosion of CO2 Transmission Pipeline Steel[C]//CORROSION 2012. Salt Lake City, UT. NACE International, 2012: 1-16.
[11] CHOI Y S, NESIC S, YOUNG D.Effect of Impurities on the Corrosion Behavior of CO2 Transmission Pipeline Steel in Supercritical CO2-Water Environments[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(23): 9233-9238.
[12] LI C, XIANG Y, LI W G.Initial Corrosion Mechanism for API 5L X80 Steel in CO2/SO2- saturated Aqueous Solution within a CCUS System: Inhibition Effect of SO2 Impurity[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2019, 321: 134663.
[13] XIANG Y, LI C, LONG Z W, et al.Electrochemical Behavior of Valve Steel in a CO2/Sulfurous Acid Solution[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2017, 258: 909-918.
[14] Preparation, Installation, Analysis, and Interpretation of Corrosion Coupons in Oilfield Operations: NACE SP0775-2018[S]. NACE International[nace], 2018.
[15] HUA Y, SHAMSA A, BARKER R, et al.Protectiveness, Morphology and Composition of Corrosion Products Formed on Carbon Steel in the Presence of Cl-, Ca2+ and Mg2+ in High Pressure CO2 Environments[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 455: 667-682.
[16] XIANG Y, WANG Z, XU C, et al.Impact of SO2 Concentration on the Corrosion Rate of X70 Steel and Iron in Water-Saturated Supercritical CO2 Mixed with SO2[J]. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2011, 58(2): 286-294.
[17] HEMMINGSEN T, VANGDAL H, VÅLAND T. Formation of Ferrous Sulfide Film from Sulfite on Steel under Anaerobic Conditions[J]. Corrosion, 1992, 48(6): 475-481.
[18] DUGSTAD A, MORLAND B, CLAUSEN S.Corrosion of Transport Pipelines for CO2-Effect of Water Ingress[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 3063-3070.
[19] FARELAS F, CHOI Y S, NEŠIĆ S. Corrosion Behavior of API 5L X65 Carbon Steel under Supercritical and Liquid Carbon Dioxide Phases in the Presence of Water and Sulfur Dioxide[J]. Corrosion, 2013, 69(3): 243-250.
[20] KIMURA M, KIHIRA H, OHTA N, et al.Control of Fe(O, OH)6 Nano-Network Structures of Rust for High Atmospheric-Corrosion Resistance[J]. Corrosion Science, 2005, 47(10): 2499-2509.
[21] EL MENDILI Y, BARDEAU J F, RANDRIANANTO ANDRO N, et al.New Evidences of in situ Laser Irradiation Effects on Γ-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles: A Raman Spectroscopic Study[J]. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 2011, 42(2): 239-242.
[22] 苏航, 姜红, 陈煜太, 等. 拉曼光谱法检验热敏纸的研究[J]. 中华纸业, 2017, 38(16): 44-49.
SU H, JIANG H, CHEN Y T, et al.A Study on Testing Thermal Paper with Raman Spectrometry[J]. China Pulp & Paper Industry, 2017, 38(16): 44-49.
[23] 潘启亮, 赵建国, 姚利花, 等. FeCO3/rGO复合材料的合成及其储钠性能[J]. 电源技术, 2022, 46(10): 1100-1104.
PAN Q L, ZHAO J G, YAO L H, et al.FeCO3/rGO Composite Material Synthesis and Properties of Sodium Storage[J]. Chinese Journal of Power Sources, 2022, 46(10): 1100-1104.
[24] ILYA KUPENKO, INNOKENTY KANTOR, et al.High-pressure Raman Spectroscopic Study of Siderite (FeCO3). American Mineralogist, 2004, 89(1): 85-90.
[25] 王嘉豪, 胡凌, 张晓华, 等. 激光波长对拉曼光谱检测地质成分的影响[J]. 中国无机分析化学, 2024, 14(6): 795-800.
WANG J H, HU L, ZHANG X H, et al.Effect of Laser Wavelength in Raman Spectrum Detection of Geological Components[J]. Chinese Jorunal of Inorganic Analytical Chemistry, 2024, 14(6): 795-800.
[26] 武俊文, 贾文峰, 雷群, 等. 储气库注采井环空保护液的研制与性能评价[J]. 油田化学, 2017, 34(2): 329-334.
WU J W, JIA W F, LEI Q, et al.Research and Performance Evaluation of Annulus Protection Fluid for Injection and Production Well of Gas Storage[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2017, 34(2): 329-334.
[27] CHIO C H, SHARMA S K, MUENOW D W.Micro- Raman Studies of Hydrous Ferrous Sulfates and Jarosites[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2005, 61(10): 2428-2433.
[28] CHIO C H, SHARMA S K, MUENOW D W.The Hydrates and Deuterates of Ferrous Sulfate (FeSO4): a Raman Spectroscopic study[J]. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy: an International Journal for Original Work in all Aspects of Raman Spectroscopy, Including Higher Order Processes, and also Brillouin and Rayleigh Scattering, 2007, 38(1): 87-99.
[29] 银浩. 碳基金属电催化剂的制备及其电催化氧还原的研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2024.
YIN H.Preparation of Carbon-based Metal Electrocatalysts and Research on Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2024.
[30] HAN D S, BATCHELOR B, ABDEL-WAHAB A.XPS Analysis of Sorption of Selenium(IV) and Selenium(VI) to Mackinawite (FeS)[J]. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 2013, 32(1): 84-93.
[31] NESBITT H W, SCAINI M, HÖCHST H, et al. Synchrotron XPS Evidence for Fe2+-S and Fe3+-S Surface Species on Pyrite Fracture-Surfaces, and Their 3D Electronic States[J]. American Mineralogist, 2000, 85(5/6): 850-857.
[32] CAI Y F, PAN Y G, XUE J Y, et al.Comparative XPS Study between Experimentally and Naturally Weathered Pyrites[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2009, 255(21): 8750-8760.
[33] CHATURVEDI S, KATZ R, GUEVREMONT J, et al.XPS and LEED Study of a Single-Crystal Surface of Pyrite[J]. American Mineralogist, 1996, 81(1/2): 261-264.
[34] LAAJALEHTO K, KARTIO I, NOWAK P.XPS Study of Clean Metal Sulfide Surfaces[J]. Applied Surface Science, 1994, 81(1): 11-15.
[35] ALLAM I M, ARLOW J S, SARICIMEN H.Initial Stages of Atmospheric Corrosion of Steel in the Arabian Gulf[J]. Corrosion Science, 1991, 32(4): 417-432.
[36] PEISERT H, CHASSÉ T, STREUBEL P, et al.Relaxation Energies in XPS and XAES of Solid Sulfur Compounds[J]. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 1994, 68: 321-328.
PDF(7980 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/