The thickness uniformity of thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) plays a pivotal role in ensuring effective and comprehensive thermal protection of turbine blades throughout their operational life cycle. Uniform coating thickness is crucial because inconsistencies can result in localized overheating, premature material degradation, and reduced service life of turbine blades, ultimately compromising the operational reliability and efficiency of gas turbine engines. Traditional approaches for achieving thickness uniformity primarily depend on extensive trial-and-error experimental iterations. This reliance on empirical methods not only significantly elevates manufacturing costs, but also considerably reduces production efficiency and repeatability.
To overcome these inherent limitations, the work aims to introduce an innovative and systematic approach integrating precise geometric analysis of blade surfaces with advanced Gaussian distribution modeling of spray energy and material deposition dynamics. The core objective is to facilitate dynamic optimization of the coating spray process through predictive modeling rather than empirical experimentation. Specifically, a novel coating thickness deposition model is proposed, which uniquely incorporates the intricate local geometric characteristics inherent in complex turbine blade surfaces, thereby bridging the gap between geometric complexity and coating performance. Building upon this innovative geometric modeling framework, a curvature-driven optimization algorithm specifically tailored to dynamically adjust critical spray parameters is further developed. These parameters include spray angle, trajectory spacing, and spray distance, which are all strategically modulated based on precise local curvature metrics derived from detailed blade surface geometrical analyses. By continuously adjusting these parameters in real-time or near-real-time during the coating spray process, the algorithm ensures optimal thickness distribution even across highly intricate and geometrically complex regions of turbine blades. Such targeted adjustments effectively minimize typical coating defects such as over-spraying (excess deposition resulting in wastage and surface irregularities) and under-spraying (insufficient coating leading to inadequate thermal protection). To rigorously validate and assess the practical efficacy and robustness of the proposed optimization method, an extensive response surface analysis (RSA) was meticulously conducted. The RSA systematically combined various critical curvature radii, including values at 20 mm, 40 mm, 60 mm, and 200 mm, alongside distinct spray angles such as 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90°. This comprehensive set of parameter combinations facilitated the generation of a detailed, multidimensional response surface dataset. Subsequently, rigorous numerical simulations employing these systematically varied parameters were performed on realistically modeled turbine blade geometries. This enabled a comprehensive evaluation of the coating performance across a wide spectrum of curvature scenarios and spray angles. Results from these detailed numerical simulations demonstrated significant improvements in coating thickness uniformity. The optimized spraying paths, driven by curvature-sensitive adjustments, effectively mitigated previously challenging local variations, resulting in a remarkable uniformity achievement rate of approximately 93.8%. Beyond demonstrating clear quantitative improvements, detailed analyses of simulation data offered novel and critical insights into the underlying physical mechanisms by which surface geometry, specifically local curvature, affected spray energy distribution and subsequent deposition patterns. Crucially, the mechanisms were clarified through which curvature-driven parameter adjustments substantially reduced localized deposition errors, thereby significantly enhancing both coating uniformity and overall coating quality. Furthermore, clear and quantifiable correlations were established between optimal spray parameters obtained from RSA and specific curvature profiles, enabling predictive and adaptive control strategies essential for the implementation of intelligent robotic spraying systems. In conclusion, an original, curvature-driven methodology is significantly advanced for dynamically optimizing thermal barrier coating thickness on complex free-form turbine blade surfaces. This innovative approach not only markedly enhances coating uniformity and operational efficiency but also represents a substantial improvement over conventional empirical iterative methods. The proposed model and optimization strategy offer robust theoretical foundations and practical guidance crucial for intelligent robotic path planning and fully automated spray coating processes. Consequently, this study provides valuable insights into cutting-edge thermal spray technologies, paving the way for further advancements in smart manufacturing, precision process control, and enhanced operational reliability of turbine systems.
Key words
thermal barrier coatings /
thickness deposition model /
uniformity /
path planning /
coating thickness optimization
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] PEREPEZKO J H.The Hotter the Engine, the Better[J]. Science, 2009, 326(5956): 1068-1069.
[2] RAJENDRAN R.Gas Turbine Coatings - an Overview[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2012, 26: 355-369.
[3] WEI Z Y, MENG G H, CHEN L, et al.Progress in Ceramic Materials and Structure Design Toward Advanced Thermal Barrier Coatings[J]. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2022, 11(7): 985-1068.
[4] PADTURE N P, GELL M, JORDAN E H.Thermal Barrier Coatings for Gas-Turbine Engine Applications[J]. Science, 2002, 296(5566): 280-284.
[5] FAUCHAIS P, VARDELLE M, GOUTIER S.Latest Researches Advances of Plasma Spraying: From Splat to Coating Formation[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2016, 25(8): 1534-1553.
[6] JOULIA A, BOLELLI G, GUALTIERI E, et al.Comparing the Deposition Mechanisms in Suspension Plasma Spray (SPS) and Solution Precursor Plasma Spray (SPPS) Deposition of Yttria-Stabilised Zirconia (YSZ)[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2014, 34(15): 3925-3940.
[7] SHARMA A, KUMAR A, DE LA TORRE B G, et al. Liquid-Phase Peptide Synthesis (LPPS): A Third Wave for the Preparation of Peptides[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2022, 122(16): 13516-13546.
[8] GORAL M, KOTOWSKI S, NOWOTNIK A, et al.PS-PVD Deposition of Thermal Barrier Coatings[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2013, 237: 51-55.
[9] LEWKE M, WU H J, LIST A, et al.Automated Trajectory Planning and Analytical Improvement for Automated Repair by Robot-Guided Cold Spray[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2024, 33(2): 515-529.
[10] XIA W S, ZHANG H O, WANG G L, et al.Integrated Robotic Plasma Spraying System for Advanced Materials Processing[J]. PIERS Online, 2008, 4(8): 876-880.
[11] REN J Z, SUN Y D, HUI J Z, et al.Coating Thickness Optimization for a Robotized Thermal Spray System[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2023, 83: 102569.
[12] FANG D D, ZHENG Y, ZHANG B T, et al.Automatic Robot Trajectory for Thermal-Sprayed Complex Surfaces[J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 2018(1): 8697056.
[13] YANG F, CAI Z H, CHEN Y P, et al.A Robotic Polishing Trajectory Planning Method Combining Reverse Engineering and Finite Element Mesh Technology for Aero-Engine Turbine Blade TBCS[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2022, 31(7): 2050-2067.
[14] IKEUCHI D, VARGAS-USCATEGUI A, WU X F, et al.Data-Driven Overlapping-Track Profile Modeling in Cold Spray Additive Manufacturing[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2024, 33(2): 530-539.
[15] MALAMOUSI K, DELIBASIS K, ALLCOCK B, et al.Digital Transformation of Thermal and Cold Spray Processes with Emphasis on Machine Learning[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2022, 433: 128138.
[16] GAO S, ZHANG X Q, CHEN L W, et al.Review: Radiation Temperature Measurement Methods for Engine Turbine Blades and Environment Influence[J]. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2022, 123: 104204.
[17] VENKATACHALAPATHY V, KATIYAR N K, MATTHEWS A, et al.A Guiding Framework for Process Parameter Optimisation of Thermal Spraying[J]. Coatings, 2023, 13(4): 713.
[18] BOLOT R, DENG S H, CAI Z H, et al.A Coupled Model between Robot Trajectories and Thermal History of the Workpiece during Thermal Spray Operation[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2014, 23(3): 296-303.
[1] CAI Z H, DENG S H, LIAO H L, et al.The Effect of Spray Distance and Scanning Step on the Coating Thickness Uniformity in Cold Spray Process[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2014, 23(3): 354-362.
[19] CAI Z H, LIANG X F, CHEN B G, et al.A Geodesic- Based Robot Trajectory Planning Approach for Cold Spray Applications[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2019, 28(5): 939-945.
[20] CHEN Y, CHEN W Z, LI B, et al.Paint Thickness Simulation for Painting Robot Trajectory Planning: A Review[J]. Industrial Robot, 2017, 44(5): 629-638.
[21] ZHANG Y J, LI W B, LI D Y, et al.Modeling of Thickness and Profile Uniformity of Thermally Sprayed Coatings Deposited on Cylinders[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2018, 27(3): 288-295.
[22] KATRANIDIS V, KAMNIS S, GU S.Prediction of Coating Properties of Thermally Sprayed WC-Co on Complex Geometries[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2018, 27(6): 1025-1037.
[23] ZHANG Y J, LI W B, ZHANG C, et al.A Spherical Surface Coating Thickness Model for a Robotized Thermal Spray System[J]. Robotics and Computer- Integrated Manufacturing, 2019, 59: 297-304.
[24] CHEN T Y, DONG S J, CAI Z H, et al.Study on Robot Trajectory Planning and Coating Thickness Prediction for Plasma Spraying on Complex Surface[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2024, 131: 1046-1060.
[25] TRIFA F I, MONTAVON G, CODDET C, et al.Geometrical Features of Plasma-Sprayed Deposits and Their Characterization Methods[J]. Materials Characterization, 2005, 54(2): 157-175.