Effects of Chemical-mechanical Polishing Parameters on Material Removal Rate of Zirconia Ceramic

WANG Guang-ling, LIU Wei-li, LIU Yu-xiang, KONG Hui, HUO Jun-chao, SONG Zhi-tang

Surface Technology ›› 2018, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9) : 266-271.

PDF(2283 KB)
PDF(2283 KB)
Surface Technology ›› 2018, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9) : 266-271. DOI: 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2018.09.035
Surface Quality Control and Detection

Effects of Chemical-mechanical Polishing Parameters on Material Removal Rate of Zirconia Ceramic

  • WANG Guang-ling1, LIU Yu-xiang1, KONG Hui1, LIU Wei-li2, HUO Jun-chao2, SONG Zhi-tang2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The work aims to investigate mechanisms of influence and action of different process parameters including SiO2 abrasive solid content, polishing pad and down pressure on chemico-mechanical polishing (CMP) rate of zirconia ceramic. pH of silica sol was regulated to 10 by using sodium-type steady silica sol with particle size of 80 nm and sodium hydroxide solution (as pH regulator). CP-4 polisher was used to performzirconia ceramics polishing experiment and collect coefficient of friction, and viscosity tester was used to test viscosity of silica sol of different solid content, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to analyze microstructure of two SUBA series polishing pads. When the solid content of silica sol was 37%, the material removal rate (MRR) was the quickest (54.3 nm/min), and COF was the minimum (0.1501). Continuous increase of solid content was accompanied by slight increase of COF which remained at around 0.1540. The polishing mechanism in which solid content of silica sol was over 37% was the result of hydromechanics, while the polishing mechanism in which solid content of silica sol was below 37% was the result of hydromechanics and mechanics. Compared with microstructure of SUBA600 polishing pad, that of SUBA800 polishing pad exhibited more and smaller pores. The MRR of SUBA800 was10 nm/min higher than that of SUBA600, since abundant pores have changed the contact mechanism of silica sol and polishing pads, increased shear force and COF, and intensified mechanical effect, which further accelerated polishing rate. The COF had no connection with down pressure. The MRR conformed to Preston equation when the down pressure was lower than 3.5 psi. For the CMP of zirconia ceramics, MRR is the quickest at the solid content of 37%. SUBA800 is more suitable for zirconia ceramics polishing than SUBA600. If the down pressure is below 3.5 psi, the MRR conforms to Preston equation and COF has no connection with down pressure.

Key words

CMP; zirconia ceramic; SiO2; polishing mechanism; polishing pad; solid content

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Guang-ling, LIU Wei-li, LIU Yu-xiang, KONG Hui, HUO Jun-chao, SONG Zhi-tang. Effects of Chemical-mechanical Polishing Parameters on Material Removal Rate of Zirconia Ceramic[J]. Surface Technology. 2018, 47(9): 266-271

Funding

Supported by Science and Technology Council of Shanghai (14XD1425300) and Zhangjiang National Innovation Demonstration Zone Special Development Funds (201609-JS-B2074-002 and 201609-JS-C1085-015)
PDF(2283 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/