目的 提高非球面玻璃镜片的抛光面型精度。方法 针对非球面玻璃镜片抛光加工中存在面型补偿精度差的问题。采用聚氨酯作为磨头的抛光方式,通过分析抛光工具与工件的接触状态和速度关系,考虑了不同位置抛光路径积分弧长的差异,构建去除函数模型;探究抛光工具与工件的转速比对去除函数廓形高斯分布特性程度及各点等驻留时间下整体去除量均匀性的影响;分析不同转速比的面型补偿驻留时间及补偿精度,最后采用最优转速比对非球面玻璃镜片进行抛光实验。结果 证明了转速比为1时去除函数廓形高斯特性、整体去除量均匀性最佳,均匀系数为0.068。对非球面玻璃进行面型补偿抛光仿真与实验。结果表明最优转速比条件下的驻留时间最平稳,且仿真的补偿面型精度最高。通过抛光面型补偿实验将非球面玻璃镜片γPV从6.275 3 μm降低至0.220 3 μm,γRMS从1.949 5 μm降低至0.036 4 μm。结论 以转速比1作为参数可以提升去除廓形高斯分布特性程度及整体去除量均匀性。与其他转速比相比,转速比为1的面型补偿驻留时间更平缓,加工面型精度更高。证明了最优转速比对非球面玻璃镜片面型精度提升与驻留时间平稳控制的有效性。
Abstract
A small-tool polishing technique that can significantly improve surface figure accuracy and the stability of surface figure compensation without altering the polishing tool is proposed. By investigating the optimal tool-to-workpiece speed ratio, the precision and stability of surface figure compensation can be further enhanced. Considering the challenges in aspheric glass lens polishing, such as insufficient polishing accuracy and the occurrence of surface figure defects, this study focuses on optimizing the speed ratio between the polishing tool and the workpiece to improve both surface figure compensation accuracy and process stability.
With aspheric glass lenses as the polishing objects, a polyurethane tool is employed for surface figure compensation polishing. Based on the contact conditions between the polishing tool and the workpiece, pressure and velocity distributions are analyzed, and the variation of integrated polishing path lengths at different radial positions is considered to establish a material removal function model. Surface figure errors are measured using a UA3P measurement system. Tool-to-workpiece speed ratios of 20, 2, 1, -20, -2, and -1 are investigated through model simulations combined with experimental validation to examine their effect on the Gaussian characteristics of the removal function profile and the uniformity of overall material removal under equal dwell times. Furthermore, simulations are used to compare dwell times and surface figure compensation accuracy under different speed ratios. Finally, polishing experiments on various aspheric glass lenses are conducted using the optimal speed ratio, and the polishing performance is evaluated by comparing the peak-to-valley (γPV) and root-mean-square (γRMS) surface figure errors before and after polishing.
Based on the established material removal model, the results indicate that a speed ratio of 1 yields the optimal Gaussian characteristics of the removal function and the highest uniformity of overall material removal, with a simulated uniformity coefficient of 0.092 and an experimental value of 0.068. Surface figure compensation simulations and experiments show that under the optimal speed ratio, the dwell time is most stable, and the simulated compensation accuracy is the highest. Polishing experiments reduce the peak-to-valley (γPV) value of aspheric glass lenses from 6.275 3 μm to 0.220 3 μm, and the root-mean-square (γRMS) value from 1.949 5 μm to 0.036 4 μm. Repeated experiments further verify these results, reducing the γPV value from 1.432 μm to 0.247 8 μm and γRMS from 0.387 9 μm to 0.036 7 μm. Additionally, surface figure compensation tests on another lens demonstrate a γPV reduction from 1.110 1 μm to 0.188 2 μm and γRMS from 0.273 4 μm to 0.032 2 μm, further confirming the effectiveness of the surface figure compensation method.
Using a speed ratio of 1 as the optimal process parameter enhances the Gaussian characteristics of the material removal profile and improves the uniformity of overall material removal. Compared with other speed ratios, a ratio of 1 produces surface figure compensation dwell times that are smoother and more closely match the pre-polishing surface figure error, enabling more accurate correction of the targeted surface deviations. This results in higher and more stable surface figure accuracy. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the optimal speed ratio in improving aspheric glass lens surface figure precision while ensuring stable dwell time control.
关键词
非球面玻璃镜片 /
转速比 /
去除函数廓形 /
高斯分布 /
驻留时间控制 /
面型精度
Key words
aspheric glass lens /
relative speed ratio /
removal function profile /
Gaussian distribution /
dwell time control /
surface form accuracy
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 王美荣, 陈敏, 蒋嘉豪, 等. 激光表面毛化对Ti/K9玻璃扩散焊接头性能的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(14): 130-137.
WANG M R, CHEN M, JIANG J H, et al.Effect of Laser Texturing Technology on Joint Properties of Ti to K9 Glass Diffusion Bonding[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(14): 130-137.
[2] 耿其东, 李春燕. 磁力研磨加工K9光学玻璃的实验研究[J]. 表面技术, 2018, 47(7): 112-118.
GENG Q D, LI C Y.Experimental Study on Magnetic Abrasive Finishing K9 Optical Glass[J]. Surface Technology, 2018, 47(7): 112-118.
[3] 王家庆, 郭磊, 刘天罡, 等. 弹性基体软固结磨料磨具的材料去除机理[J]. 中国表面工程, 2024, 37(1): 192-204.
WANG J Q, GUO L, LIU T G, et al.Material Removal Mechanism of the Elastic Soft-Bonded Abrasive Tool[J]. China Surface Engineering, 2024, 37(1): 192-204.
[4] 刘锋伟, 吴永前, 陈强, 等. 大口径光学非球面镜先进制造技术概述[J]. 光电工程, 2020, 47(10): 200203.
LIU F W, WU Y Q, CHEN Q, et al.Overview of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of Large-Aperture Aspheric Mirror[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2020, 47(10): 200203.
[5] LI Z, JIANG F, JIANG Z Y, et al.Energy Beam-Based Direct and Assisted Polishing Techniques for Diamond: A Review[J]. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 2024, 6(1): 012004.
[6] 曾沛, 舒志文, 陈艺勤, 等. 宽束离子束刻蚀快速加工金属纳米间隙结构[J]. 光学精密工程, 2023, 31(1): 109-118.
ZENG P, SHU Z W, CHEN Y Q, et al.Rapid Fabrication of Metallic Nanogap Structures by Shower Ion Beam Etching[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2023, 31(1): 109-118.
[7] 伊圣振, 黄秋实, 齐润泽, 等. 等离子体诊断用多层膜X射线成像光学研究进展[J]. 光学精密工程, 2022, 30(21): 2783-2792.
YI S Z, HUANG Q S, QI R Z, et al.Research Progress of Multilayer X-Ray Imaging Optics for Plasma Diagnostics[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2022, 30(21): 2783-2792.
[8] DING J T, FAN X W, XU L, et al.High-Precision Resin Layer Polishing of Carbon Fiber Mirror Based on Optimized Ion Beam Figuring Process[J]. Optik, 2020, 206: 163575.
[9] MI S C, TOROS A, GRAZIOSI T, et al.Non-Contact Polishing of Single Crystal Diamond by Ion Beam Etching[J]. Diamond and Related Materials, 2019, 92: 248-252.
[10] YADAV R D, SINGH A K, ARORA K.Parametric Analysis of Magnetorheological Finishing Process for Improved Performance of Gear Profile[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2020, 57: 254-267.
[11] BEDI T S, KANT R.Comparative Performance of Magnetorheological External Finishing Tools Using Different Magnetic Structures[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 41: 908-914.
[12] 刘海涛, 李野, 王银河, 等. 光学非球面零件凹面的机器人柔性抛光[J]. 新技术新工艺, 2018(6): 34-37.
LIU H T, LI Y, WANG Y H, et al.Robot Flexible Polishing to Concave Surface of Optical Aspheric Parts[J]. New Technology & New Process, 2018(6): 34-37.
[13] ZHANG J G, ZHENG Z D, HUANG K, et al.Field-Assisted Machining of Difficult-to-Machine Materials[J]. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 2024, 6(3): 032002.
[14] 李伟, 胡小龙, 段辉高, 等. 硬脆元件表面低温等离子体及其复合加工技术研究现状分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(23): 246-261.
LI W, HU X L, DUAN H G, et al.Research Status Analysis of Low Temperature Plasma and Its Compound Processing Technology on the Surface of Hard and Brittle Components[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(23): 246-261.
[15] 陈华男, 王君林, 李显凌, 等. 光学元件双转子抛光技术中类高斯型去除函数建模与逼近[J]. 光子学报, 2013, 42(3): 282-287.
CHEN H N, WANG J L, LI X L, et al.Modelling and Approximation of Gaussian-Like Removal Function in Dual-Rotor Polishing Technology of Optics Elements[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2013, 42(3): 282-287.
[16] 徐梓榕, 黄启泰, 任建锋. 基于超高斯函数的球形抛光工具去除函数库建立方法[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2024, 61(17): 306-312.
XU Z R, HUANG Q T, REN J F.Removal Function Library for Spherical Polishing Tools Based on Super-Gaussian Function[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(17): 306-312.
[17] 彭文强, 尹韶辉. 基于狭缝射流抛光的去除函数优化[J]. 航空精密制造技术, 2019, 55(6): 1-4.
PENG W Q, YIN S H.Material Removal Optimization of Jet Polishing Based on Slit Nozzle[J]. Aviation Precision Manufacturing Technology, 2019, 55(6): 1-4.
[18] WANG C J, YANG W, WANG Z Z, et al. Research on the Precession Angle (PA) Adopted in Polishing Large Aspheric Mirror[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 472/473/474/475: 1126-1131.
[19] 董子铭, 章亚男, 刘志刚, 等. 偏心双转子运动抛光工艺研究及中频误差的抑制研究[J]. 中国激光, 2021, 48(24): 46-57.
DONG Z M, ZHANG Y N, LIU Z G, et al.Eccentric Dual-Rotor Polishing and the Suppression of Mid-Spatial-Frequency Error: Technological Study[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(24): 46-57.
[20] 李建, 张连新, 孙鹏飞, 等. 射流抛光高斯型去除函数的快速生成方法[J]. 光学学报, 2018, 38(7): 264-272.
LI J, ZHANG L X, SUN P F, et al.Fast Generation Method of Gaussian-Shaped Removal Function of Fluid Jet Polishing[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(7): 264-272.
[21] 林琳, 赵志磊, 蒋东岑, 等. 尖边喷嘴磨料水射流特性分析及对去除函数轮廓的影响[J]. 液压与气动, 2023, 47(9): 116-129.
LIN L, ZHAO Z L, JIANG D C, et al.Characteristics Analysis of Abrasive Water Jet from Pointed Nozzle and Its Influence on Profile of Removal Function[J]. Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics, 2023, 47(9): 116-129.
[22] FENG J B, ZHANG Y F, LIN S, et al.Improving the Accuracy of TIF in Bonnet Polishing Based on Gaussian Process Regression[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2020, 110(7): 1941-1953.
[23] 陈磊, 刘阳钦, 唐川, 等. 面向超精密加工的微观材料去除机理研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(23): 229-264.
CHEN L, LIU Y Q, TANG C, et al.Research Advance on Material Removal at Microscale towards Ultra-Precision Manufacturing[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(23): 229-264.
[24] 杨黎, 弓佳璐, 王玉宁, 等. 离轴抛物面镜机械臂小磨头抛光工艺研究[J]. 中国机械, 2025(16): 66-73.
YANG L, GONG J L, WANG Y N, et al.Study on Polishing Technology of Small Grinding Head of Off-Axis Parabolic Mirror Manipulator[J]. Machine China, 2025(16): 66-73.
[25] ASPDEN R, MCDONOUGH R, NITCHIE F R.Computer Assisted Optical Surfacing[J]. Applied Optics, 1972, 11(12): 2739.
[26] 张嘉荣, 王晗, 卓少木, 等. 基于粘弹性球形小磨头的小口径非球面模具抛光[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(17): 300-309.
ZHANG J R, WANG H, ZHUO S M, et al.Polishing of Micro Aspheric Mold Based on Viscoelastic Spherical Small Polishing Tool[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(17): 300-309.
基金
广东省科技重大专项“璀璨行动”项目(CC/XM-202401ZJ0501); 中山市第十批创新科研团队项目(CXTD2023008)