竖直振动抛磨工艺参数对TC4试件表面完整性的影响

程田, 程思源, 王嘉明, 李文辉, 刘嘉俊, 李秀红

表面技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (15) : 16-28.

PDF(11560 KB)
PDF(11560 KB)
表面技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (15) : 16-28. DOI: 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2026.15.002
精密与超精密加工

竖直振动抛磨工艺参数对TC4试件表面完整性的影响

  • 程田1,2, 程思源1,2, 王嘉明1,2, 李文辉2,3, 刘嘉俊1,2, 李秀红1,2,*
作者信息 +

Effect of Vertical Vibratory Finishing Parameters on Surface Integrity of TC4 Specimens

  • CHENG Tian1,2, CHENG Siyuan1,2, WANG Jiaming1,2, LI Wenhui2,3, LIU Jiajun1,2, LI Xiuhong1,2,*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探究竖直振动抛磨工艺参数对TC4试件表面完整性的影响规律。方法 采用单因素试验分析振幅、频率、埋入深度、安装角度、颗粒介质直径及加工时间对TC4试件表面残余应力、表面粗糙度及应力集中系数的影响,结合离散元仿真分析作用机制,优选工艺参数。结果 加工时间90 min内各指标变化显著,之后趋缓并进入稳定阶段;颗粒介质直径的影响最大,随颗粒介质直径增大,试件表面残余压应力、粗糙度下降率、应力集中系数下降量均呈先升后降趋势;增大安装角度,残余压应力减小,但粗糙度下降率、应力集中系数下降量增大;增大振幅、频率,残余应力、粗糙度、应力集中系数均显著提升,但超过一定程度后改善幅度减小,甚至出现回落;增大埋入深度,残余压应力小幅增加,粗糙度与应力集中系数变化微小。结论 优选工艺参数为:振幅3.5 mm,频率40 Hz,埋入深度40 mm,安装角度45°,颗粒介质直径4 mm。在该参数下,试件表面残余压应力由-82.75 MPa提升至-438.73 MPa,Ra值自0.837 μm降至0.189 μm,应力集中系数从1.036降至1.005。

Abstract

The work aims to explore the effect of vertical vibratory finishing process parameters on the surface integrity indexes (including residual stress, surface roughness and stress concentration factor) of TC4 specimens. In this study, the effects of amplitude (2.5-4.5 mm), frequency (20-40 Hz), immersion depth (20-40 mm), installation angle (0°-90°), granular media diameter (2-10 mm) and processing time (0-180 min) on the surface integrity indexes are systematically analyzed by single-factor tests. Combined with discrete element simulations, the average contact force and the relative velocity (including both normal and tangential components) between the granular media and the specimen surface are extracted, and the effect of each process parameter on the dynamic behavior of the granular media is revealed accordingly. Considering the effect of various parameters on the roughness reduction rate, the compressive residual stress on the specimen surface, and the decrease in the stress concentration factor, the process parameters that achieve both low surface roughness and high compressive residual stress are optimized.
The experimental results showed that all surface integrity indexes change significantly during the initial stage of processing (within approximately 90 min), after which the changes slow down and eventually enter a stable stage. Among all the parameters examined, the diameter of the granular media has the greatest effect. Specifically, as the granular media diameter increased, the compressive residual stress, the roughness reduction rate, and the decrease in the stress concentration factor all increase first and then decrease, and the optimal diameter is determined to be 4 mm. As the installation angle increases, the compressive residual stress on the specimen surface decreases sharply, from -498.8 MPa at 0° to -256.1 MPa at 90°. The roughness reduction rate is poor at 0°, reaching only 20.9%. When the installation angle increases, the surface roughness processing effect becomes noticeably better. After the installation angle exceeds 45°, the roughness reduction rate tends to stabilize, and the maximum reduction rate observed is 78.5%. With increasing amplitude, each surface integrity index is significantly improved. However, once the amplitude exceeds 3.5 mm, the growth rate of the compressive residual stress slows down, and the roughness reduction rate tends to saturate at approximately 79.3%. With increasing frequency, the surface compressive residual stress increases markedly, and the maximum compressive residual stress reaches -421.6 MPa. The surface roughness tends to stabilize after 30 Hz, although some fluctuations are still observed. The decrease in the stress concentration factor is the largest at 30 Hz. As the immersion depth increases, the compressive residual stress increases only slightly, while the roughness and stress concentration factor show little change.
The optimized process parameters are determined as follows: amplitude of 3.5 mm, frequency of 40 Hz, immersion depth of 40 mm, installation angle of 45°, and granular media diameter of 4 mm. Under these optimized parameters, the compressive residual stress on the specimen surface increases from -82.75 MPa to -438.73 MPa, the average surface roughness Ra value decreases from 0.837 μm to 0.189 μm, and the stress concentration factor decreases from 1.036 to 1.005.

关键词

竖直振动抛磨 / 表面粗糙度 / 残余应力 / 应力集中系数 / 钛合金 / 离散元法

Key words

vertical vibratory finishing / surface roughness / residual stress / stress concentration factor / titanium alloy / discrete element method

引用本文

导出引用
程田, 程思源, 王嘉明, 李文辉, 刘嘉俊, 李秀红. 竖直振动抛磨工艺参数对TC4试件表面完整性的影响[J]. 表面技术. 2026, 55(15): 16-28
CHENG Tian, CHENG Siyuan, WANG Jiaming, LI Wenhui, LIU Jiajun, LI Xiuhong. Effect of Vertical Vibratory Finishing Parameters on Surface Integrity of TC4 Specimens[J]. Surface Technology. 2026, 55(15): 16-28
中图分类号: TG580.692   

参考文献

[1] LIU Q J, YANG Z P, DONG X X, et al.A Quality Prediction Approach for Compressor Blade Manufacturing with Various Geometric Dimensions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2025, 22: 21400-21411.
[2] TANG P F, SUN J Z, NIAN J C, et al.Uncertainty Quantification of the Impact of High-Pressure Compressor Blade Geometric Deviations on Aero Engine Performance[J]. Aerospace, 2025, 12(9): 767.
[3] 位景山, 郑群, 闫巍, 等. 基于气动激励特征的压气机叶片高周疲劳分析[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2023, 44(9): 1579-1589.
WEI J S, ZHENG Q, YAN W, et al.High Cycle Fatigue Analysis of Compressor Blade Based on Aerodynamic Excitation Characteristics[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2023, 44(9): 1579-1589.
[4] 胡殿印, 王涛, 杜俊良, 等. GH2787压气机叶片激光-喷丸复合强化疲劳强度提升方法[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(6): 20240017.
HU D Y, WANG T, DU J L, et al.Coupled Laser-Shot Peening for Fatigue Strength Enhancement Method on GH2787 Compressor Blade[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(6): 20240017.
[5] CANALS L, BADREDDINE J, MCGILLIVRAY B, et al.Effect of Vibratory Peening on the Sub-Surface Layer of Aerospace Materials Ti-6Al-4V and E-16NiCrMo13[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2019, 264: 91-106.
[6] SHI H L, LIU D X, PAN Y F, et al.Effect of Shot Peening and Vibration Finishing on the Fatigue Behavior of TC17 Titanium Alloy at Room and High Temperature[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2021, 151: 106391.
[7] PILGAR C M, FERNANDEZ A M, SEGURADO J.A Fatigue Life Model Accounting for the Combined Effect of Surface Roughness and Microstructure: Application to SLM Fabricated Hastelloy-X[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2024, 184: 108298.
[8] CHANG S, ZHANG K, TAN J P, et al.The Effect of Residual Stress on High-Cycle Fatigue Properties and Its Evaluation Method of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy[J]. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 2024, 47(10): 3633-3645.
[9] CAO Y L, YAO C F, TAN L, et al.Vibration Fatigue Strength Prediction of Precision-Milled ATI718 Plus Alloy Blades: Surface Integrity and Fatigue Performance[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2025, 200: 109104.
[10] 杨胜强, 李永刚, 李文辉. 航空钛合金抗疲劳表面改性技术研究进展[J]. 航空制造技术, 2017, 60(13): 28-35.
YANG S Q, LI Y G, LI W H.Development of Anti-Fatigue Surface Modification Technology of Aeronautical Titanium Alloy[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 60(13): 28-35.
[11] 李雪伍, 李征奇, 董丽虹, 等. 表面强化技术对金属材料疲劳性能影响研究综述[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2025, 32(4): 15-26.
LI X W, LI Z Q, DONG L H, et al.Review of Effects of Surface Strengthening Techniques on Fatigue Properties of Metal Materials[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2025, 32(4): 15-26.
[12] 尚一博, 伏宇, 张璇, 等. 激光冲击强化TC17钛合金叶片高周疲劳强度评估模型[J]. 表面技术, 2025, 54(11): 184-194.
SHANG Y B, FU Y, ZHANG X, et al.High Cycle Fatigue Strength Evaluation Model for TC17 Titanium Alloy Blades Strengthened by Laser Shock Peening[J]. Surface Technology, 2025, 54(11): 184-194.
[13] 王强, 吕心如, 孙志豪, 等. 表面机械滚压处理对2024铝合金表面粗糙度及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(4): 282-289.
WANG Q, LYU X R, SUN Z H, et al.Influence of Surface Mechanical Rolling Treatment on Surface Roughness and Properties of 2024 Aluminum Alloy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2025, 50(4): 282-289.
[14] 卜嘉利, 吕扬, 刘博志, 等. 不同喷丸强度对TC17钛合金抗疲劳性能影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2022, 37(6): 1225-1233.
BU J L, LYU Y, LIU B Z, et al.Effect of Different Shot Peening Intensities on Fatigue Resistance of TC17 Titanium Alloy[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(6): 1225-1233.
[15] FAN K F, LIU D X, LIU Y J, et al.Competitive Effect of Residual Stress and Surface Roughness on the Fatigue Life of Shot Peened S42200 Steel at Room and Elevated Temperature[J]. Tribology International, 2023, 183: 108422.
[16] 杨胜强, 李文辉, 陈红玲, 等. 表面光整加工理论与新技术[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2011.
YANG S Q, LI W H, CHEN H L.Surface Finishing Theory and New Technology[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2011.
[17] 韩锐, 李秀红, 王嘉明, 等. 水平强制振动光整加工对TC4钛合金表面完整性参数的影响[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(17): 2037-2047.
HAN R, LI X H, WANG J M, et al.Influences of Horizontal Forced Vibration Finishing on Surface Integrity Parameters of TC4 Titanium Alloys[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 34(17): 2037-2047.
[18] 张燎原, 李文辉, 温学杰, 等. 基于多层进化神经网络的立式振动式滚磨光整关系模型构建及工艺参数优化[J]. 表面技术, 2025, 54(16): 131-140.
ZHANG L Y, LI W H, WEN X J, et al.Relational Model and Optimization of Process Parameters for Vertical Vibratory Finishing with Multi-Layer Evolutionary Neural Network[J]. Surface Technology, 2025, 54(16): 131-140.
[19] ZHANG J Y, YAO C F, CUI M C, et al.Three-Dimensional Modeling and Reconstructive Change of Residual Stress during Machining Process of Milling, Polishing, Heat Treatment, Vibratory Finishing, and Shot Peening of Fan Blade[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2021, 9(3): 430-445.
[20] 牛啸, 李秀红, 王嘉明, 等. 容器尺寸对叶片竖直强制振动光整加工效果的影响[J]. 中国表面工程, 2023, 36(5): 167-178.
NIU X, LI X H, WANG J M, et al.Influence of Container Size on Processing Effect of Vertical Forced Vibration Finishing for Blades[J]. China Surface Engineering, 2023, 36(5): 167-178.
[21] KLONGBOONJIT S, CAMPBELL C S.Convection in Deep Vertically Shaken Particle Beds. I. General Features[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2008, 20(10): 103301.
[22] 梁振华, 李秀红, 王兴富, 等. “反L形容器” 尺寸对圆柱滚子竖直振动超精滚抛效果的影响[J]. 中国机械工程, 2025, 36(3): 444-454.
LIANG Z H, LI X H, WANG X F, et al.Influences of Size of "Reverse L-Container" on Effect of Vertical Vibration Superfinishing Rolling of Cylindrical Rollers[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2025, 36(3): 444-454.
[23] WANG J M, LI X H, CHEN H B, et al.Research on the Container Configuration for Revolution-Assisted Horizontal Vibration Finishing of Aero-Engine Blades[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2024, 126: 124-140.
[24] ALCARAZ J Y, ZHANG J, NAGALINGAM A P, et al.Numerical Modeling of Residual Stresses during Vibratory Peening of a 3-Stage Blisk-a Multi-Scale Discrete Element and Finite Element Approach[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2022, 299: 117383.
[25] WANG S W, CHEN J H, LIU Z G, et al.Novel Contact Force Measurement in Vibratory Finishing[J]. Powder Technology, 2023, 415: 118158.
[26] 张荔, 李文辉, 杨胜强. 滚磨光整加工中磨料颗粒堆积角的离散元参数标定[J]. 中国科技论文, 2016, 11(16): 1821-1825.
ZHANG L, LI W H, YANG S Q.Calibration of Discrete Element Parameters of Abrasive Particle in Mass Finishing Process[J]. China Sciencepaper, 2016, 11(16): 1821-1825.
[27] ZHAO J Y, TANG J Y, ZHOU W H, et al.Numerical Modeling and Experimental Verification of Residual Stress Distribution Evolution of 12Cr2Ni4A Steel Generated by Shot Peening[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2022, 430: 127993.
[28] 赵鑫, 李秀红, 李文辉, 等. 主轴式滚磨光整加工主要参数对力链影响研究[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2022(12): 113-119.
ZHAO X, LI X H, LI W H, et al.Research on Influence of Main Parameters of Spindle Barrel Finishing on Force Chain[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2022(12): 113-119.
[29] 张凯, 李秀红, 李文辉, 等. 水平振动式滚磨光整加工中力链演化及量化分析[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2024, 43(4): 628-636.
ZHANG K, LI X H, LI W H, et al.Evolution and Quantitative Analysis of Force Chain in Process of Horizontal Vibration Mass Finishing[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2024, 43(4): 628-636.

基金

国家自然科学基金(52575523,52575527,51975399); 天津市自然科学基金重点项目(25JCZDJC00800)

PDF(11560 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/