激光清洗印花镍网表面PVA的机理研究

齐保明, 李红军, 张宏伟, 陈伟, 左丹英

表面技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (10) : 153-162.

PDF(5377 KB)
PDF(5377 KB)
表面技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (10) : 153-162. DOI: 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2026.10.013
激光表面改性技术

激光清洗印花镍网表面PVA的机理研究

  • 齐保明a, 李红军b, 张宏伟a, 陈伟b, 左丹英a,b*
作者信息 +

Mechanism of Laser Cleaning on PVA Coating on Printed Nickel Mesh Surface

  • QI Baominga, LI Hongjunb, ZHANG Hongweib, CHEN Weia, ZUO Danyinga,b,*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 揭示印花镍网表面交联聚乙烯醇(PVA)涂层在CO2脉冲激光作用下的去除行为及机理,明确纵向光斑搭接率对热积累、热解特征和清洗效果的影响规律。方法 结合热重分析(TGA)、有限元数值模拟与不同纵向光斑搭接率(η=15%、30%、45%、60%)激光清洗实验,研究涂层热解行为、温度场演化与脱除形式。结果 TGA显示涂层在约330 ℃与400 ℃出现两处DTG峰,分别对应脱水/主链初裂与深度裂解-碳化阶段。数值模拟表明,随η增大温度场由“孤立热点”向“连续热积累带”演化,表面基线最高温度为114~247 ℃,整体低于DTG峰值温区,说明η=30%~45%条件下涂层去除主要由失水干燥、交联网络收缩/松弛及界面热应力累积引起的中温脆化剥离主导;η=60%时重复照射更易产生局部热点并诱发碳化残留,阻碍进一步脱除。实验表明清洗机理随η呈三阶段演变:η=15%以浅层挥发为主;η=30%~45%以脆化-固态剥离为主,且综合效率最高;η=60%出现碳化阻滞。结论 提出了交联PVA涂层的分区去除机理与双模式协同机制,并确定η=30%~45%为兼顾高效去除与基材保护的优选光斑搭接率范围。

Abstract

To clarify the removal behavior and mechanism of crosslinked poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) coatings on printed nickel mesh under CO2 pulsed-laser irradiation, the effects of longitudinal spot overlap ratio on thermal accumulation, thermal decomposition, and cleaning performance are systematically investigated. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA/DTG), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), laser cleaning experiments, mass-change analysis, and three-dimensional transient finite-element simulations are combined to establish the relationship among the thermal decomposition characteristics of the coating, temperature-field evolution, and removal behavior. TGA/DTG results show that the crosslinked PVA coating exhibits two major mass-loss-rate peaks at about 330 ℃ and 400 ℃, corresponding respectively to dehydration/initial chain scission and deeper cracking accompanied by carbonization. Laser cleaning experiments are carried out at longitudinal overlap ratios of 15%, 30%, 45%, and 60%. The experimental results reveal a pronounced dependence of removal mode on overlap ratio. At 15% overlap, the smoke concentration and vaporized mass are the highest, indicating that the absorbed energy is mainly consumed by superficial volatilization and moisture release, whereas the effective stripping of the coating remains limited. At 30%-45% overlap, the cleaning performance is markedly improved. In this range, repeated heating-cooling cycles promote dehydration drying, network shrinkage/relaxation, and interfacial thermal-stress accumulation caused by thermal-expansion mismatch between the coating and the nickel substrate, thereby facilitating embrittlement cracking and interfacial debonding. As a result, the coating is removed mainly by solid-phase peeling, and the overall removal efficiency is the best. At 60% overlap, the vaporized mass decreases further and the cleaning effect deteriorates, indicating that excessive overlap is unfavorable for continuous coating removal. Finite-element simulations show that, with increasing overlap ratio, the surface temperature field evolves from isolated hot spots to a more continuous thermal-accumulation band. The maximum baseline surface temperature increases from about 114 ℃ to 247 ℃, but generally remains below the DTG peak-temperature range. This indicates that large-area rapid pyrolysis is not the dominant removal mechanism under the present processing conditions. Instead, coating removal at overlap ratios up to 45% is governed mainly by moderate-temperature dehydration, embrittlement, and interfacial debonding induced by repeated thermal cycling. However, when the overlap ratio reaches 60%, local hot spots become more pronounced. Combined with the high transverse overlap in the experiments, such local overheating can promote dehydration, unsaturation, and carbonization in limited regions. FT-IR analysis further supports this interpretation. For the samples cleaned at overlap ratios of 15%-45%, the post-cleaning spectra show only limited differences, indicating that chemical decomposition is relatively weak and that removal in this range is dominated mainly by physical embrittlement and interfacial peeling. In contrast, the sample treated at 60% overlap exhibited significantly enhances C==C and C==O absorption bands, confirming dehydration- induced unsaturation and oxidative carbonization. The carbonized products form a barrier layer that hinders subsequent volatilization and peeling, leading to a carbonization-inhibition effect. Based on the combined evidence, a segmented removal mechanism and a dual-mode synergistic mechanism are proposed for laser cleaning of crosslinked PVA coatings on printed nickel mesh. Within the present parameter window, coating removal is governed mainly by moderate-temperature dehydration drying, embrittlement, and interfacial debonding, while localized pyrolysis/carbonization plays a secondary role and becomes detrimental at excessive overlap. As the overlap ratio increases, the dominant cleaning mechanism evolves through three stages: superficial volatilization, efficient embrittlement-assisted stripping, and carbonization inhibition. Therefore, a longitudinal spot overlap ratio of 30%-45% is recommended as the optimal range for balancing efficient coating removal and substrate protection.

关键词

激光清洗 / 聚乙烯醇交联聚合物 / 热重分析 / FTIR / 数值模拟 / 去除机理

Key words

laser cleaning / crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) polymer / thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) / FTIR / numerical simulation / removal mechanism

引用本文

导出引用
齐保明, 李红军, 张宏伟, 陈伟, 左丹英. 激光清洗印花镍网表面PVA的机理研究[J]. 表面技术. 2026, 55(10): 153-162
QI Baoming, LI Hongjun, ZHANG Hongwei, CHEN Wei, ZUO Danying. Mechanism of Laser Cleaning on PVA Coating on Printed Nickel Mesh Surface[J]. Surface Technology. 2026, 55(10): 153-162
中图分类号: TG176   

参考文献

[1] ZHANG S H, WANG F Y, TAN B M, et al.Recent Advances and Future Developments in PVA Brush Scrubbing Cleaning: A Review[J]. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 2022, 152: 107122.
[2] SHI Y T, CHEN W, WANG J, et al.CO2 Laser Cleaning of Cross-Linked Polymer Coating on Metal Mesh[J]. Applied Optics, 2022, 61(29): 8671-8677.
[3] ZHU G D, WANG S R, CHENG W, et al.Corrosion and Wear Performance of Aircraft Skin after Laser Cleaning[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2020, 132: 106475.
[4] ZOU W F, SONG F, LUO Y.Characteristics of Audible Acoustic Signal in the Process of Laser Cleaning of Paint on Metal Surface[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2021, 144: 107388.
[5] ZHUANG S S, KAINUMA S, YANG M Y, et al.Characterizing Corrosion Properties of Carbon Steel Affected by High-Power Laser Cleaning[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 274: 122085.
[6] WANG W J, SUN L X, LU Y, et al.Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Online Monitoring of Laser Cleaning Quality on Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2022, 145: 107481.
[7] ZHANG G X, HUA X M, HUANG Y, et al.Investigation on Mechanism of Oxide Removal and Plasma Behavior during Laser Cleaning on Aluminum Alloy[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2020, 506: 144666.
[8] LIU B W, WANG C M, MI G Y, et al.Oxygen Content and Morphology of Laser Cleaned 5083 Aluminum Alloy and Its Influences on Weld Porosity[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2021, 140: 107031.
[9] LI Z C, ZHANG D H, SU X, et al.Removal Mechanism of Surface Cleaning on TA15 Titanium Alloy Using Nanosecond Pulsed Laser[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2021, 139: 106998.
[10] YANG J N, ZHOU J Z, SUN Q, et al.Digital Analysis and Prediction of the Topography after Pulsed Laser Paint Stripping[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2021, 62: 685-694.
[11] SOTROP J, KERSCH A, DOMKE M, et al.Numerical Simulation of Ultrafast Expansion as the Driving Mechanism for Confined Laser Ablation with Ultra-Short Laser Pulses[J]. Applied Physics A, 2013, 113(2): 397-411.
[12] KIRAN KUMAR K, SAMUEL G L, SHUNMUGAM M S.Theoretical and Experimental Investigations of Ultra- Short Pulse Laser Interaction on Ti6Al4V Alloy[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2019, 263: 266-275.
[13] 万磊, 王裕光, 左小艳, 等. 激光清洗5083铝合金表面漆层的数值模拟与试验研究[J]. 激光与红外, 2022, 52(6): 803-813.
WAN L, WANG Y G, ZUO X Y, et al.Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study on Laser Cleaning of 5083 Aluminum Alloy Surface Paint Layer[J]. Laser & Infrared, 2022, 52(6): 803-813.
[14] WANG X S, HUANG Y K, LI C Y, et al.Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study on Picosecond Laser Ablation of Stainless Steel[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2020, 127: 106150.
[15] LI Z C, XU J, ZHANG D H, et al.Nanosecond Pulsed Laser Cleaning of Titanium Alloy Oxide Films: Modeling and Experiments[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2022, 82: 665-677.
[16] 李红军, 石雅婷, 张弛, 等. 圆筒网涂层激光清除的扫描覆盖模型研究[J]. 激光与红外, 2022, 52(12): 1774-1780.
LI H J, SHI Y T, ZHANG C, et al.Scanning Coverage Model Study of Laser Removal of Cylindrical Mesh Coating[J]. Laser & Infrared, 2022, 52(12): 1774-1780.
[17] 李红军, 石雅婷, 张弛, 等. 聚乙烯醇交联聚合物的激光蚀键特性研究[J]. 激光与红外, 2023, 53(4): 501-505.
LI H J, SHI Y T, ZHANG C, et al.Study on Laser Ablation Characteristics of Polyvinyl Alcohol Cross- Linked Polymers[J]. Laser & Infrared, 2023, 53(4): 501-505.
[18] 邸腾达, 杨煜珩, 赵卿钰, 等. SiCf/SiC复合材料纳秒激光烧蚀机理研究[J]. 表面技术, 2026, 55(2): 124-133.
DI T D, YANG Y H, ZHAO Q Y, et al.Nanosecond Laser Ablation Mechanism of SiCf/SiC Composites[J]. Surface Technology, 2026, 55(2): 124-133.
[19] 彭浩东, 段生炜, 杨林玉, 等. 镀铝超表面材料激光刻蚀研究: 从kHz纳秒激光到GHz飞秒激光[J]. 表面技术, 2025, 54(24): 106-117.
PENG H D, DUAN S W, YANG L Y, et al.Laser Etching of Aluminum-Coated Metasurfaces: From kHz Nanosecond Laser to GHz Femtosecond Laser[J]. Surface Technology, 2025, 54(24): 106-117.
[20] ZHOU X, IMASAKI K, FURUKAWA H, et al.Simulation Study and Experiment on Laser-Ablation Surface Cleaning[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2001, 33(3): 189-194.
[21] PETELA R.Exergy of Undiluted Thermal Radiation[J]. Solar Energy, 2003, 74(6): 469-488.
[22] 施曙东, 杜鹏, 李伟, 等. 1064nm准连续激光除漆研究[J]. 中国激光, 2012, 39(9): 903001.
SHI S D, DU P, LI W, et al.Research on Paint Removal with 1064 nm Quasi-Continuous-Wave Laser[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2012, 39(9): 903001.
[23] YUE L Y, WANG Z B, LI L.Modeling and Simulation of Laser Cleaning of Tapered Micro-Slots with Different Temporal Pulses[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2013, 45: 533-539.
[24] KUMAR A, GUPTA M C.Surface Preparation of Ti-3Al-2.5V Alloy Tubes for Welding Using a Fiber Laser[J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2009, 47(11): 1259-1265.
[25] 陈雪姣, 郭连红, 曾鹏. 热传导方程在3种无界区域上的二择—结果[J]. 海南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 38(4): 309-317.
CHEN X J, GUO L H, ZENG P.Alternative Results of Heat Conduction Equations in Three Unbounded Regions[J]. Natural Science Journal of Hainan University, 2020, 38(4): 309-317.
[26] 胥康, 任恒飞, 任金莲, 等. 纯无网格并行计算在传热方程数值模拟中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(理学版), 2019, 57(6): 1372-1378.
XU K, REN H F, REN J L, et al.Application of Pure Mesh-Free Parallel Computation in Numerical Simulation of Heat Transfer Equation[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Science Edition), 2019, 57(6): 1372-1378.
[27] 李玉山. 一类热传导方程移动边界问题的数值求解[J]. 商丘师范学院学报, 2012, 28(12): 23-29.
LI Y S.Numerical Method of Moving Boundary Problem for a Class of Heat Conduction Equation[J]. Journal of Shangqiu Normal University, 2012, 28(12): 23-29.
[28] 由学志, 由希雨, 白杨. 印花镍网的规格型号和质量指标[J]. 印染, 2006, 32(17): 26-28.
YOU X Z, YOU X Y, BAI Y.Specification and Quantity Indicators of Nickel Screen[J]. Dyeing & Finishing, 2006, 32(17): 26-28.

PDF(5377 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/