高能大气等离子喷涂功率对固体氧化物燃料电池电解质组织与性能的影响

赵澳婷, 宋琛, 匡同春, 张梦婷, 杜心海, 刘太楷, 文魁, 毛杰, 张小锋, 刘敏

表面技术 ›› 2025, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (20) : 217-227.

PDF(3867 KB)
PDF(3867 KB)
表面技术 ›› 2025, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (20) : 217-227. DOI: 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2025.20.016
表面功能化

高能大气等离子喷涂功率对固体氧化物燃料电池电解质组织与性能的影响

  • 赵澳婷1,2, 宋琛2,*, 匡同春1, 张梦婷2, 杜心海2, 刘太楷2, 文魁2, 毛杰2, 张小锋2, 刘敏2
作者信息 +

Effect of High Energy Atmospheric Plasma Spraying Power on the Structure and Performance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Electrolyte

  • ZHAO Aoting1,2, SONG Chen2,*, KUANG Tongchun1, ZHANG Mengting2, DU Xinhai2, LIU Taikai2, WEN Kui2, MAO Jie2, ZHANG Xiaofeng2, LIU Min2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 提高GDC电解质的致密度和GDC电池的电化学性能。方法 通过配备Metco Triplex Pro-210喷枪的大气等离子喷涂系统(APS)分别在70、75和80 kW的喷涂功率下制备了GDC电解质。利用spray watch 2i、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、纳米压痕仪和电化学工作站等检测设备对粒子的飞行状态以及涂层微观形貌、力学性能、电化学性能进行表征。系统探究喷涂功率对GDC电解质致密性和电池输出性能的影响。结果 80 kW喷涂功率下GDC粒子的沉积效果最好,沉积的涂层中的孔洞和裂纹数目最少,涂层孔隙率为5.26%。此时的GDC涂层具有较好的力学性能,其硬度和弹性模量值分别为(6.93±0.12)、(173.23±17.04) GPa。在600 ℃下,80 kW电池的开路电压为0.91 V,峰值功率密度为219.86 mW/cm2,欧姆阻抗为0.64 Ω∙cm2,电导率为0.009 4 S/cm。结论 80 kW喷涂功率下GDC粒子的沉积效果最好,涂层的力学性能、组织性能以及电化学性能等综合性能最佳。

Abstract

Metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells (MS-SOFCs) have gained significant attention in recent years as a promising development branch for expanding application boundaries and reducing costs. To prevent rapid degradation of the metal substrate due to high-temperature operation, Gd2O3 doped CeO2 (GDC), which exhibits high conductivity at medium and low temperatures, has emerged as a promising candidate. Plasma spraying technology, which directly melts materials without requiring high-temperature sintering, can effectively suppress elemental interdiffusion between the metal substrate and the electrode. The spraying power of atmospheric plasma spraying (APS) significantly impacts the microstructure and performance of the coating.
GDC electrolytes were prepared at spraying powers of 70, 75 and 80 kW through an APS system equipped with a Metco Triplex Pro-210 spray torch. For the single-particle deposition experiments, the traverse speed of the spray torch was set to 1 000 mm/s, and the particles were deposited onto a polished substrate. The Spray Watch 2i system was used to monitor the surface temperature and flight speed of the powder particles in the plasma jet, varying with different spraying distances and spraying powers. The deposition morphology of individual particles and the microstructure of cells were observed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The mechanical properties of the electrolyte coatings were assessed with a nanoindenter, while the electrochemical performance, including open-circuit voltage, peak power density, and impedance, was measured through an electrochemical workstation.
The impact of spraying power on the density of the GDC electrolytes and the performance of the cells was systematically investigated. The results indicated that at a spraying power of 80 kW, the GDC powder particles in the plasma jet reached the highest surface temperature, resulting in improved melting and fewer voids during particle stacking. Furthermore, at 80 kW, the particles demonstrated higher flight speed, which further minimized the formation of pores and cracks. The GDC particles with optimal melting were deposited onto the substrate in a radial pattern, exhibiting a smooth, uniform deposition morphology and strong adhesion to the substrate, with no noticeable peeling. Additionally, no significant pores or cracks were observed in the coating deposited at 80 kW, and the coating porosity was only 5.26%. Columnar crystalline structures were observed within the coatings.
The GDC coating deposited at 80 kW exhibited excellent mechanical properties, with hardness and elastic modulus of (6.93±0.12) and (173.23±17.04) GPa, respectively. As the spraying power increased, the evaporation of Ce also increased, leading to compositional changes in the electrolyte and a reduction in cell performance. The dense electrolyte structure of the GDC cells fabricated at 80 kW spraying power led to superior electrochemical performance. At 600 ℃, the cell prepared at 80 kW exhibited an open-circuit voltage of 0.91 V, a peak power density of 219.86 mW/cm2, and an ohmic impedance of 0.64 Ω∙cm2. By calculating the conductivity of the electrolytes, at 600 ℃, the electrolyte conductivities cells under 70 kW, 75 kW and 80 kW were 0.006 6, 0.008 3, and 0.009 4 S/cm, respectively.
In summary, the coating deposited at 80 kW spraying power exhibited the best overall performance in terms of density, mechanical properties, and electrochemical performance.

关键词

金属支撑型固体氧化物燃料电池 / 大气等离子喷涂 / Metco Triplex Pro-210喷枪 / 喷涂功率 / 电化学性能

Key words

metal-supported solid oxide fuel cell / atmospheric plasma spraying (APS) / Metco Triplex Pro-210 spray torch / spraying power / electrochemical performance

引用本文

导出引用
赵澳婷, 宋琛, 匡同春, 张梦婷, 杜心海, 刘太楷, 文魁, 毛杰, 张小锋, 刘敏. 高能大气等离子喷涂功率对固体氧化物燃料电池电解质组织与性能的影响[J]. 表面技术. 2025, 54(20): 217-227 https://doi.org/10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2025.20.016
ZHAO Aoting, SONG Chen, KUANG Tongchun, ZHANG Mengting, DU Xinhai, LIU Taikai, WEN Kui, MAO Jie, ZHANG Xiaofeng, LIU Min. Effect of High Energy Atmospheric Plasma Spraying Power on the Structure and Performance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Electrolyte[J]. Surface Technology. 2025, 54(20): 217-227 https://doi.org/10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2025.20.016
中图分类号: TB34   

参考文献

[1] 赵慧琴. 固体氧化物燃料电池高温蠕变损伤与失效概率计算[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2018.
ZHAO H Q.The Computation of High-Temperature Creep Damage and Failure Probability of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2018.
[2] FUENTES R O, BAKER R T.Synthesis and Properties of Gadolinium-Doped Ceria Solid Solutions for IT-SOFC Electrolytes[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(13): 3480-3484.
[3] BURER M, TANAKA K, FAVRAT D, et al.Multi- Criteria Optimization of a District Cogeneration Plant Integrating a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Gas Turbine Combined Cycle, Heat Pumps and Chillers[J]. Energy, 2003, 28(6): 497-518.
[4] TIKIZ I, TAYMAZ I.An Experimental Investigation of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Performance at Variable Operating Conditions[J]. Thermal Science, 2016, 20(5): 1421-1433.
[5] ZHANG J, LENSER C, MENZLER N H, et al.Comparison of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) Electrolyte Materials for Operation at 500 ℃[J]. Solid State Ionics, 2020, 344: 115138.
[6] BAEK S W, JEONG J, KIM J H, et al.Interconnect-Integrated Solid Oxide Fuel Cell with High Temperature Sinter-Joining Process[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(21): 11878-11889.
[7] TUCKER M C.Progress in Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: A Review[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2010, 195(15): 4570-4582.
[8] BESSEKON Y, ZIELKE P, WULFF A C, et al.Simulation of a SOFC/Battery Powered Vehicle[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(3): 1905-1918.
[9] LENG Y J, CHAN S H, JIANG S P, et al.Low- Temperature SOFC with Thin Film GDC Electrolyte Prepared in Situ by Solid-State Reaction[J]. Solid State Ionics, 2004, 170(1/2): 9-15.
[10] YANG S, LEI Y K, AI J J, et al.Preparation of High Density Garnet Electrolytes by Impregnation Sintering for Lithium-Ion Batteries[J]. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2019, 30(8): 8089-8096.
[11] JAISWAL N, TANWAR K, SUMAN R, et al.A Brief Review on Ceria Based Solid Electrolytes for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2019, 781: 984-1005.
[12] HE Z M, YUAN H, GLASSCOCK J A, et al.Densification and Grain Growth during Early-Stage Sintering of Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95-δ in a Reducing Atmosphere[J]. Acta Materialia, 2010, 58(11): 3860-3866.
[13] SAEBEA D, AUTHAYANUN S, PATCHARAVORACHOT Y, et al.Electrochemical Performance Assessment of Low-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cell with YSZ- Based and SDC-Based Electrolytes[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(2): 921-931.
[14] ATKINSON A, BARON S, BRANDON N P, et al.Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Operation at Temperatures of 500-650℃[C]//1st International Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology Conference. Rochester, New York, USA. ASMEDC, 2003: 499-506.
[15] ZAKARIA Z, MAT Z A, ABU HASSAN S H, et al. A Review of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Component Fabrication Methods Toward Lowering Temperature[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2020, 44(2): 594-611.
[16] KIM K J, KIM S J, CHOI G M.Y0.08Sr0.88TiO3-CeO2 Composite as a Diffusion Barrier Layer for Stainless-Steel Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 307: 385-390.
[17] HENNE R.Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: A Challenge for Plasma Deposition Processes[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2007, 16(3): 381-403.
[18] ZHU Z G, SONG C, HU Y J, et al.Effect of Powder Particle Size on Anode Microstructure and Performance for Plasma-Sprayed Solid Oxide Fuel Cell[J]. Materials Research and Application, 2023, 17(2): 329-337.
[19] SHRI PRAKASH B, WILLIAM GRIPS V K, ARUNA S T. A Single Step Solution Combustion Approach for Preparing Gadolinia Doped Ceria Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Electrolyte Material Suitable for Wet Powder and Plasma Spraying Processes[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2012, 214: 358-364.
[20] ZHANG M T, SONG C, LIN K S, et al.Preparation of Plasma Sprayed GDC Electrolytes for Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2024, 33(4): 964-975.
[21] ZHA S W, XIA C R, MENG G Y.Calculation of the E.m.f. of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells[J]. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2001, 31(1): 93-98.
[22] FAUCHAIS P.2 Current Status and Future Directions of Thermal Spray Coatings and Techniques[J]. Future Development of Thermal Spray Coatings, 2015: 17-49.
[23] TRELLES J P, CHAZELAS C, VARDELLE A, et al.Arc Plasma Torch Modeling[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2009, 18(5): 728-752.
[24] BOBZIN K, ÖTE M.Modeling Multi-Arc Spraying Systems[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2016, 25(5): 920-932.
[25] MARQUÉS J L, FORSTER G, SCHEIN J. Multi- Electrode Plasma Torches: Motivation for Development and Current State-of-the-Art[J]. The Open Plasma Physics Journal, 2009, 2(1): 89-98.
[26] MULPURI N, DZHURINSKIY D, DAUTOV S, et al.Structure and Electrochemical Behavior of Coatings from Complex Concentrated Alloys Deposited by Metco Triplex Pro-210 Gun[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, 13(5): 2214-7853.
[27] RICHARDT K, BOBZIN K, SPORER D, et al.Tailor- Made Coatings for Turbine Applications Using the Triplex Pro 200[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2008, 17(5): 612-616.
[28] MUTTER M, MAUER G, MÜCKE R, et al. Systematic Investigation on the Influence of Spray Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of Atmospheric Plasma-Sprayed YSZ Coatings[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2018, 27(4): 566-580.
[29] ZHU Z G, NING H L, SONG C, et al.Effect of Low Plasma Spraying Power on Anode Microstructure and Performance for Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2024, 33(5): 1725-1735.
[30] CHEN J, DU K, ZHU Z G, et al.Preparation and Structure Control of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Cathode by Plasma Spraying[J]. Materials Research and Application, 2023, 17(6): 1117-1124.
[31] ZHANG S L, LI C X, LI C J, et al.Investigation into the Diffusion and Oxidation Behavior of the Interface between a Plasma-Sprayed Anode and a Porous Steel Support for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 323: 1-7.
[32] CHEN L M, LI Q.The Present Status and Development of Plasma Spraying Technology[J]. Heat Treatment Technology and Equipment, 2006, 27(1): 1-5.
[33] FARUK Ö M A, DÖNMEZ G, SARIBOĞA V, et al. Microstructure and Ionic Conductivity Properties of Gadolinia Doped Ceria (Gd x Ce1-x O2-x/2) Electrolytes for Intermediate Temperature SOFCs Prepared by the Polyol Method[J]. Ceramics International, 2013, 39(7): 7305-7315.
[34] WEI P, WEI Z Y, ZHAO G X, et al.Flow Characteristic of In-Flight Particles in Supersonic Plasma Spraying Process[J]. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 52(9): 1739-1753.
[35] LEE M J, LEE B C, LIM J G, et al.Residual Stress Analysis of the Thermal Barrier Coating System by Considering the Plasma Spraying Process[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2014, 28(6): 2161-2168.
[36] PANG M, ZHANG X H, LIU Q X, et al.Effect of Preheating Temperature of the Substrate on Residual Stress of Mo/8YSZ Functionally Gradient Thermal Barrier Coatings Prepared by Plasma Spraying[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2020, 385: 125377.
[37] SODEOKA S, SUZUKI M, UENO K, et al.Thermal and Mechanical Properties of ZrO2-CeO2 Plasma-Sprayed Coatings[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 1997, 6(3): 361-367.
[38] JIMÉNEZ-PIQUÉ E, GAILLARD Y, ANGLADA M. Instrumented Indentation of Layered Ceramic Materials[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2007, 333: 107-116.
[39] QIAO X, WANG Y M, WENG W X, et al.Influence of Pores on Mechanical Properties of Plasma Sprayed Coatings: Case Study of YSZ Thermal Barrier Coatings[J]. Ceramics International, 2018, 44(17): 21564-21577.
[40] MAHATO N, SHARMA S, KESHRI A K, et al.Nanomechanical Properties and Thermal Conductivity Estimation of Plasma-Sprayed, Solid-Oxide Fuel Cell Components: Ceria-Doped, Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Electrolyte[J]. JOM, 2013, 65(6): 749-762.
[41] BRANDON N P, BLAKE A, CORCORAN D, et al.Development of Metal Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Operation at 500-600℃[J]. Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, 2004, 1: 61-65.
[42] MURUTOGLU M, UCUN T, ULASAN O, et al.Cold Sintering-Assisted Densification of GDC Electrolytes for SOFC Applications[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(45): 19772-19779.
[43] TSAI C H, HWANG C S, CHANG C L, et al.Performances of Plasma Sprayed Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and Stack[J]. Fuel Cells, 2018, 18(6): 800-808.
[44] ZHANG M T, SONG C, LIU M, et al.Study on the Performance of GDC Electrolytes Fabricated by Atmospheric Plasma Spraying and Vacuum Plasma Spraying[J]. Ceramics International, 2024, 50(21): 44391-44400.
[45] CHAVAN A U, JADHAV L D, JAMALE A P, et al.Effect of Variation of NiO on Properties of NiO/GDC (Gadolinium Doped Ceria) Nano-Composites[J]. Ceramics International, 2012, 38(4): 3191-3196.
[46] MUHAMMED ALI S A, ANWAR M, ASHIKIN N, et al. Influence of Oxygen Ion Enrichment on Optical, Mechanical, and Electrical Properties of LSCF Perovskite Nanocomposite[J]. Ceramics International, 2018, 44(9): 10433-10442.
[47] ZHANG T S, HING P, HUANG H T, et al.Ionic Conductivity in the CeO2-Gd2O3 System (0.05≤Gd/Ce≤0.4) Prepared by Oxalate Coprecipitation[J]. Solid State Ionics, 2002, 148(3/4): 567-573.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2023YFE0108000); 国家自然科学基金(52201069); 广东省科技计划项目(2023B1212060045,2023B1212120008); 广东省科学院青年人才专项(2024GDASQNRC-0208); 广东省科学院发展专项资金项目(2024GDASZH-2024010102); 广东省科学院新材料研究所专项资金项目(2023GINMZX-202301020104); 广州市基础与应用基础研究项目(2025A04J5111)

PDF(3867 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/