胥超,樊文欣,赵俊生,梁大珍.连杆衬套表面粗糙度评定方法对比分析[J].表面技术,2013,42(6):109-112.
XU Chao,FAN Wen-xin,ZHAO Jun-sheng,LIANG Da-zhen.Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Methods for the Surface Roughness of Connecting Rod Bushings[J].Surface Technology,2013,42(6):109-112 |
| 连杆衬套表面粗糙度评定方法对比分析 |
| Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Methods for the Surface Roughness of Connecting Rod Bushings |
| 修订日期：2013-08-12 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 连杆衬套 高斯滤波 小波法 表面粗糙度评定 |
| 英文关键词:connecting rod bushing gaussian filter wavelet method evaluation of surface roughness |
| 基金项目:山西省自然科学基金(2012011023-2) ;山西省高校高新技术产业化项目(20120021) |
|
|
|
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 准确测量连杆衬套表面粗糙度。 方法 采用高斯滤波法和小波分析法两种方法对连杆衬套表面粗糙度进行评定,并将评定结果与实测结果作对比。 结果 高斯滤波和小波法的相对误差分别为 1 . 7046% 和 0 . 9037% 。 结论 采用高斯滤波和小波分析评定连杆衬套的表面粗糙度都具有可行性,相比之下,小波法的评定结果更为准确。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To measure the surface roughness of connecting rod bushings accurately. Methods Use the methods of gaussian filter and wavelet analysis to evaluate the surface roughness of connecting rod bushings, and compare the evaluation results with the measured results. Results The respective relative error of Gauss filter and wavelet method was 1 . 7046 % and 0 . 9037 % . Conclusion It was verified that both the gaussian filter and wavelet analysis were feasible for the evaluation of the surface roughness of connecting rod bushings, and the evaluation methods of the wavelet method were more accurate. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
渝公网安备 50010702501715号